This document provides information on the model-based small area estimates of substance use and mental disorders in substate regions based on data from the combined 2014-2016 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUHs). The estimates along with other related information are available at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/.
NSDUH is an annual survey conducted from January through December of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population aged 12 or older and is sponsored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NSDUH is planned and managed by SAMHSA's Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (CBHSQ). Data collection and analysis are conducted under contract with RTI International.1
NSDUH is the primary source of statistical information on the use of illicit drugs, alcohol, and tobacco by the U.S. civilian, noninstitutionalized population aged 12 or older. The survey also includes several series of questions that focus on mental health issues. Conducted by the federal government since 1971, NSDUH collects data through face-to-face interviews with a representative sample of the population at the respondent's place of residence.
In 2014-2016, the survey collected data from 203,916 respondents aged 12 or older and was designed to obtain representative samples from the 50 states and the District of Columbia. It covers residents of households and noninstitutional group quarters (e.g., shelters, rooming houses, dormitories) and from civilians living on military bases. NSDUH excludes homeless people who do not use shelters, military personnel on active duty, and residents of institutional group quarters, such as jails and hospitals.
The 1999 survey marked the first year in which the national sample was interviewed using a computer-assisted interviewing (CAI) method. The survey used a combination of computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) conducted by an interviewer and audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI). Use of ACASI is designed to provide the respondent with a highly private and confidential means of responding to questions and increases the level of honest reporting of illicit drug use and other sensitive behaviors. For further details on the development of the CAI procedures for the 1999 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA),2 see the Office of Applied Studies (OAS, 2001).3
The 1999 through 2001 NHSDAs and the 2002 through 2013 NSDUHs employed an independent, multistage area probability sample for each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. For this design, eight states were designated as large sample states (California, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas) with target sample sizes of 3,600 per year. For the remaining 42 states and the District of Columbia, the target sample size was 900 per year. This approach ensured that there was sufficient sample in every state to support small area estimation (SAE) production at the state and substate level, while at the same time maintaining efficiency for national estimates. The design also oversampled youths aged 12 to 17 and young adults aged 18 to 25 so that each state's sample was approximately equally distributed among three major age groups: 12 to 17 years, 18 to 25 years, and 26 years or older.
A coordinated design was developed for the 2014 through 2017 NSDUHs. Similar to the 1999 through 2013 surveys, the coordinated 4-year design is state-based with an independent, multistage area probability sample within each state and the District of Columbia. This design designates 12 states as large sample states that have the following target sample sizes per year: 4,560 completed interviews in California; 3,300 completed interviews each in Florida, New York, and Texas; 2,400 completed interviews each in Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania; and 1,500 completed interviews each in Georgia, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Virginia. Making the sample sizes more proportional to the state population sizes improves the precision of national NSDUH estimates. This change also allows for a more cost-efficient sample allocation to the 12 large sample states while slightly increasing the sample sizes in the 38 remaining smaller states and the District of Columbia to improve the precision of state and substate estimates.4
Starting in 2014, the allocation of the NSDUH sample is 25 percent for adolescents aged 12 to 17, 25 percent for adults aged 18 to 25, and 50 percent for adults aged 26 or older. The sample of adults aged 26 or older is further divided into three subgroups: aged 26 to 34 (15 percent), aged 35 to 49 (20 percent), and aged 50 or older (15 percent). For more information on the 2014 through the 2017 NSDUH sample design and for differences between the 2013 and 2014 surveys, refer to the 2014 NSDUH sample design report (CBHSQ, 2015a).
This marks the eighth time5 that estimates for substate regions (also referred to as planning regions or substate areas) in all 50 states and the District of Columbia have been presented by SAMHSA. Here, substate-level small area estimates are provided for 14 binary (0, 1) substance use or mental health measures using combined data from the 2014-2016 NSDUHs for individuals aged 12 or older (or adults 18 or older for the five mental health outcomes, and individuals aged 12 to 20 for underage alcohol use). For a list of outcomes for which substate-level estimates are available, refer to Table A1 at the end of this section. These substate estimates are available at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/. The list of products (e.g., tables, maps, substate region definitions) related to the 2014-2016 substate estimates is provided in Section A.2.
Estimates for 406 substate regions were generated using the 2014-2016 NSDUH data. These substate regions were defined by government officials from each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia and were typically based on the substance abuse treatment planning regions specified by the states in their applications for the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant (SABG) administered by SAMHSA. The SABG program provides financial and technical assistance to the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and other jurisdictions to support substance abuse prevention and treatment programs and to promote public health. States use NSDUH substate estimates for a variety of purposes, including strategic planning and program development, production of epidemiological profiles for briefing state legislatures and informing the public, allocating funds to substate areas based on the need for services, and other uses. More information on defining these regions is available in Section A.3.
Section A.4 discusses the methodological changes that were introduced in the 2002 NSDUH. An unanticipated result of these changes was that the prevalence rates for 2002 were in general substantially higher than those for 2001. As a result, the 1999-2001 substate estimates are not comparable with the other substate estimates. Additionally, this section discusses NSDUH questionnaire changes from 2015 and how these changes affect the small area estimates. Section A.5 discussed related substance use measures and warns users about not drawing conclusions by subtracting small area estimates from two different measures.
Section B provides information on the SAE methodology used to produce substate estimates. Section C includes the population estimates and the combined 2014, 2015, and 2016 NSDUH sample sizes and response rates for each substate region. Users may find the population estimates helpful in calculating the prevalence estimate for any combination of substate regions or to determine the number of people using a particular substance in a substate region. For example, the number of individuals aged 12 or older who used marijuana in the past month in Alabama's Region 1 (58,320 individuals) can be obtained by multiplying the prevalence rate (5.10 percent) from Table 2 in the "2014-2016 NSDUH Substate Regions: Excel Tables" (see https://www.samhsa.gov/data/) and the population estimate from Table C1 (1,143,525) in this document. Section D lists the references cited in this document, and Section E provides a list of contributors to the production of the 2014-2016 substate estimates.
In addition to this methodology document for the 2014-2016 substate SAE results, the following files are available at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/:
Note that other products may be added to the 2014-2016 NSDUH substate homepage at a later date.
The substate regions for each state were developed in a series of communications during the fall of 2017 between SAMHSA staff and state officials responsible for the SABG application. There is extensive variation in the size and use of substate regions across the states. In some states, the substate regions are used more for administrative purposes rather than for planning purposes. The goal of the project was to provide substate-level estimates showing the geographic distribution of substance use prevalence for regions that states would find useful for planning and reporting purposes. The final substate region boundaries were based on the state's recommendations, assuming that the NSDUH sample sizes were large enough to provide estimates with adequate precision.
Most states defined regions in terms of counties or groups of counties. A few states defined the regions in terms of census tracts. Several states also requested estimates for aggregate substate regions, along with the estimates for their substate regions. An aggregate substate region is made up of two or more substate regions. These substate region definitions are available in a document titled "2014-2016 NSDUH Substate Region Definitions" (see https://www.samhsa.gov/data/ as listed in Section A.2). Some of the states (specifically, New Hampshire, Texas, and Washington) wanted the maps to be produced only for the aggregate regions. For example, Washington has eight substate regions, and those eight regions were combined to create three aggregate regions that are used in the maps. Hence, for each measure, maps were produced for 395 regions and not for 406 regions.
The 395 substate regions used in the maps were ranked from lowest to highest for each measure and were divided into seven categories (based on estimates rounded to two decimals) designed to represent distributions that are somewhat symmetric, as in a normal distribution. Colors were assigned to all substate regions such that the third having the lowest prevalence are in blue (132 substate regions), the middle third are in white (131 substate regions), and the third with the highest prevalence are in red (132 substate regions). To further distinguish among the substate regions that display relatively higher prevalence, the "highest" third in red has been subdivided into (a) dark red for the 18 substate regions with the highest estimates, (b) medium red for the 37 substate regions with the next highest estimates, and (c) light red for the 77 substate regions in the third highest group. The "lowest" third is categorized in a similar way using three distinct shades of blue. In some cases, a group (or category) could have more or fewer substate regions because two (or more) substate regions have the same estimate (to two decimal places). When such ties occurred at the "boundary" between two groups, all substate regions with the same estimate (to two decimal places) were assigned to the lower group. The upper and lower limits of each of the seven categories shown in the map legend collectively define a continuum and are not necessarily the actual values of a particular substate region.
For example, in Figure 6 (national map showing alcohol use in the past month among persons aged 12 or older) (see the "2014-2016 NSDUH National Maps of Prevalence Estimates, by Substate Region" at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/ as listed in Section A.2), the values on the boundary in the lowest category (group 1) correspond to Utah County in Utah (21.10 percent) and Salt Lake County in Utah (35.81 percent) and are displayed in the legend. In the next to lowest category, Region 2 in Mississippi (36.10 percent) and Region 3 in South Carolina (42.36 percent) are the regions with the lowest and highest values; however, in the continuum of the legend, the lower limit for group 2 was assigned a value of 35.82 percent because the upper limit of group 1 is 35.81 percent.
The 2014-2016 substate estimates and corresponding Bayesian CIs are available in the "2014-2016 NSDUH Substate Region Estimates: Excel Tables and CSV Files" (as mentioned in Section A.2, see https://www.samhsa.gov/data/). These tables also contain a sort order number and a map group indicator (= 1 for the national estimate, = 2 for census region estimates, = 3 for state-level estimates, = 4 if a region is part of the 395 substate/aggregate region-level estimates included in the maps, and = 5 for all other substate/aggregate region-level estimates not included in the maps).
In addition to the substate region estimates, comparable estimates are provided for the 50 states and the District of Columbia and also for the four census regions. Design-based estimates and corresponding CIs for the nation are also included. Because these estimates are based on 3 consecutive years of data, they are not directly comparable with the annually published state, census region, or national estimates that are based on only 2 consecutive years of NSDUH data. The U.S. Census Bureau defines the census regions as follows:
Northeast Region - Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
Midwest Region - Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.
South Region - Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia.
West Region - Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
For the 2002 NSDUH, a number of methodological changes were introduced, including a $30 incentive for participating in the survey, additional training for interviewers to encourage adherence to survey protocols, a change in the survey name, and a shift to the 2000 decennial census (from the 1990 census) as a basis for population counts used in sample selection, weighting, and estimation. Additional information on these methodological changes is available in a report by the OAS (2005). An unanticipated result of these changes was that the prevalence rates for 2002 were in general substantially higher than the 2001 prevalence rates. The jump in the prevalence rates between 2001 and 2002 was more than the usual year-to-year change. Because of the changes in the survey that took place in 2002, substate estimates for 1999-2001 are not comparable with the other substate estimates. It is not possible to separate the effect of the methodological changes from the true trends in substance use.
However, estimates from 2002-2004, 2004-2006, 2006-2008, 2008-2010, 2010-2012, 2012-2014, and 2014-2016 are comparable for outcome measures that were defined in a similar manner and for substate regions defined consistently across these time periods. Table A1 at the end of this section lists the outcome measures for which substate estimates were produced using 2014-2016 NSDUH data and shows the outcome measures that remained comparable over time (indicated with an "X" in the table) since 2002-2004.
It is useful to note that the 2002-2004 to 2008-2010 substate estimates were produced using predictors from the 2000 census; also, the survey weights used population projections from the 2000 census. The 2010-2012, 2012-2014, and 2014-2016 estimates, on the other hand, were produced using 2010 census data. Hence, when reviewing changes between 2008-2010 and 2014-2016, it is important to note that they may be confounded with changes due to differences in the source of the predictors and the population projections (referred to as "census effects"). The impact of such census effects on national and state estimates is discussed in Section B.4.3 in Appendix B of the 2011 NSDUH national findings report (CBHSQ, 2012) and the "2011-2012 NSDUH: Impact of Using 2010 Census Data on 2010-2011 Small Area Estimates" at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/.
During regular data collection and processing checks for the 2011 NSDUH, data errors were identified. These errors were falsified cases submitted by field interviewers that affected the data for Pennsylvania (2006 to 2010) and Maryland (2008 and 2009). Cases with erroneous data were removed from the data files, and the remaining cases were reweighted to provide representative estimates (for more details on this data error, refer to Section A.7 of the "2011-2012 NSDUH Guide to State Tables and Summary of Small Area Estimation Methodology" at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/). The 2006-2008, 2008-2010, and the 2010-2012 substate estimates exclude data based on falsified cases.
In 2015, a number of changes were made to the NSDUH questionnaire and data collection procedures. These changes were intended to improve the quality of the data that were collected and to address the changing needs of substance use and mental health policy and research.7 Discussed here briefly is the effect of the redesign on the comparability between the 2015 NSDUH and earlier NSDUHs, specifically related to the SAE outcomes. For a more detailed discussion of the questionnaire redesign and its effect, see Section C of the 2015 NSDUH's methodological summary and definitions report (CBHSQ, 2016a) and a brief report summarizing the implications of the changes for data users (CBHSQ, 2016b).
In the alcohol section of the questionnaire, the threshold for defining binge alcohol use among females was revised from five or more drinks on an occasion to four or more drinks on an occasion to ensure consistency with federal definitions.8 The threshold for males in 2015 remained at five or more drinks on an occasion. Consequently, a new baseline was established in 2015 for estimates of binge alcohol for the overall population. Thus, substate small area estimates for past month binge alcohol use using combined 2014, 2015, and 2016 data were not produced. Note that this change did not affect estimates for alcohol use or alcohol use disorder.
Several changes were made to the various illicit drug modules. Specifically, changes were made to the hallucinogen, inhalant, methamphetamine, and prescription psychotherapeutic modules. For details on these specific changes, see Section C.1 of the 2015 NSDUH methodological summary and definitions report (CBHSQ, 2016a). These changes resulted in the need to revise the baseline for the following SAE outcomes: illicit drug use in the past month, nonmedical use of pain reliever in the past year,9 illicit drug use disorder, and needing but not receiving treatment for illicit drugs.
Additionally, changes to some of the drug modules might have affected the set of respondents in 2015 who were eligible to be asked questions about treatment for substance use. Hence, SAE outcomes on needing but not receiving treatment (for illicit drugs and alcohol) were potentially affected. Thus, substance use treatment estimates were not produced using combined 2014, 2015, and 2016 NSDUH data.
Finally, although questions on the perceptions of risk of harm from using different substances did not change in 2015, data quality checks on preliminary data and the full 2015 data showed deviations from the expected trends for these measures. A survey redesign carries the risk that preceding changes to the questionnaire will affect how respondents answer later questions (e.g., context effects). A context effect may be said to take place when the response to a question is affected by information that is not part of the question itself. For example, the content of a preceding question may affect the interpretation of a subsequent question. Or a respondent may answer a subsequent question in a manner that is consistent with responses to a preceding question if the two questions are closely related to each other. The set of questions preceding the risk and availability module in the 2015 questionnaire had undergone a number of significant changes that could have affected the way in which respondents answered the perceived risk and availability questions. Because of these deviations, the perception of risk estimates were not produced using the combined 2014, 2015, and 2016 NSDUH data.
To summarize, several changes in the 2015 questionnaire had impacts on the comparability of the 2014 and 2015 NSDUH data. It was decided, therefore, that for those measures data across those 2 years could not be pooled, and estimates for those measures could not be produced using 2014-2016 NSDUH data. For a complete list of outcomes for which substate small area estimates are available using the 2014-2016 NSDUH data, refer to Table A1.
Small area estimates are produced for a number of related drug measures, such as marijuana use and illicit drug use. It might appear that one could draw conclusions by subtracting one from the other (e.g., subtracting the percentage who used cigarettes in the past month from the percentage who used tobacco products in the past month to find the percentage who used tobacco other than cigarettes in the past month). Because related measures have been estimated with different models (i.e., separate models by age group and outcome), subtracting one measure from another related measure at the substate region, state, or census region level can give misleading results, perhaps even a "negative" estimate, and should be avoided. However, these comparisons can be made at the national level because these estimates are design-based estimates. For example, at the national level, subtracting cigarette use estimates from tobacco use estimates will give the estimate of individuals who did not use cigarettes, but used other forms of tobacco.
| Measure | 2002-2004 | 2004-2006 | 2006-2008 | 2008-2010 | 2010-2012 | 2012-2014 | 2014-2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illicit Drug Use in the Past Month | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Marijuana Use in the Past Year | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Marijuana Use in the Past Month | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Perceptions of Great Risk from Smoking Marijuana Once a Month | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| First Use of Marijuana1 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Illicit Drug Use Other Than Marijuana in the Past Month | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Cocaine Use in the Past Year | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Heroin Use in the Past Year | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | X |
| Nonmedical Use of Pain Relievers in the Past Year | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Alcohol Use in the Past Month | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Underage Past Month Use of Alcohol (among Individuals Aged 12 to 20) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Binge Alcohol Use in the Past Month | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Underage Past Month Binge Alcohol Use (among Individuals Aged 12 to 20) | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Perceptions of Great Risk from Having Five or More Drinks of an Alcoholic Beverage Once or Twice a Week |
X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Tobacco Product Use in the Past Month | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Cigarette Use in the Past Month | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Perceptions of Great Risk from Smoking One or More Packs of Cigarettes per Day |
X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Alcohol Use Disorder in the Past Year2 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Alcohol Dependence in the Past Year2 | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Illicit Drug Use Disorder in the Past Year2 | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Illicit Drug Dependence in the Past Year2 | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Substance Use Disorder in the Past Year2 | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Needing But Not Receiving Treatment for Illicit Drug Use in the Past Year | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Needing But Not Receiving Treatment for Alcohol Use in the Past Year | X | X | X | X | X | X | -- |
| Serious Psychological Distress (SPD) in the Past Year3 | X | X | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Had at Least One Major Depressive Episode (MDE) in the Past Year4 | -- | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Serious Mental Illness (SMI) in the Past Year5 | -- | -- | -- | X | X | X | X |
| Any Mental Illness (AMI) in the Past Year5 | -- | -- | -- | X | X | X | X |
| Received Mental Health Services in the Past Year | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | X |
| Had Serious Thoughts of Suicide in the Past Year | -- | -- | -- | X | X | X | X |
| X = available; -- = not available. NOTE: The measures included in the 1999-2001 substate small area estimation (SAE) report are not included here. Because of the changes in the survey that took place in 2002, the 1999-2001 estimates are not comparable with the 2002-2004 or subsequent year estimates. Estimates using the combined 2002-2004, 2004-2006, and 2006-2008 data can be found at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/. Estimates using the combined 2008-2010, 2010-2012, and 2012-2014 data can also be found at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/. 1 The marijuana incidence definition used here employs a simpler form of the at-risk population based on the model-based methodology. This model-based average annual incidence rate for first use of marijuana is defined as follows: Average annual initiation of marijuana (%) = 100 × {[X1 ÷ (0.5 × X1 + X2)] ÷ 2}, where X1 is the number of marijuana initiates in the past 24 months and X2 is the number of individuals who never used marijuana (with the at-risk population defined as 0.5 × X1 + X2). Both X1 and X2 are based on binary measures that correspond to questions with a "yes" or "no" response option. For details on calculating the average annual rate of first use of marijuana from NSDUH data, see Section B of the "2015–2016 NSDUH: Guide to State Tables and Summary of Small Area Estimation Methodology" at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/. 2 Substance use disorder is defined as meeting the criteria for illicit drug or alcohol dependence or abuse. Dependence or abuse is based on definitions found in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). For more details, see Section B.4.2 in Appendix B of the 2012 NSDUH national findings report (Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality [CBHSQ], 2013b). 3 Because of questionnaire changes, SPD estimates in 2002-2004 are not comparable with the 2004-2006 SPD estimates. For details, see Section B.7 of the report on Substate Estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (Office of Applied Studies [OAS], 2008). Additional questionnaire changes were made in 2008 that affected past year SPD trends. However, revised past year SPD measures were created for 2005 through 2007 that are comparable with the 2008 through 2016 past year SPD measure. Substate small area estimates for 2006-2008, 2008-2010, 2010-2012, 2012-2014, and 2014-2016 were not created for this measure. 4 Questions used to determine MDE were added in 2004. The 2004-2006 MDE estimates are not comparable with the 2006-2008 and subsequent year estimates. For details on MDE, see Sections B.4.2 and B.4.4 in Appendix B of the 2012 NSDUH mental health findings report (CBHSQ, 2013a). 5 The mental illness measures are based on a predictive model and are not direct measures of diagnostic status (i.e., a small subsample of the respondents received a clinical follow-up, and these responses along with questionnaire data were used to create predictive models for all of the respondents). For details about these measures and the predictive models, see Section B.4.3 in Appendix B of the 2012 NSDUH mental health findings report (CBHSQ, 2013a). Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Surveys on Drug Use and Health, 2002–2016. | |||||||
| State | 2008-2010 | 2012-2014 | 2014-2016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Substate Regions1 |
Number of Map Regions2 |
Number of Substate Regions1 |
Number of Map Regions2 |
Number of Substate Regions1 |
Number of Map Regions2 |
Number of Substate Regions Overlapping with 2008– 20103 |
Number of Substate Regions Overlapping with 2012– 20143 |
|
| Total U.S. | 383 | 362 | 384 | 362 | 406 | 395 | 304 | 345 |
| Alabama | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Alaska | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Arizona | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| Arkansas | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| California | 27 | 27 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 25 | 26 |
| Colorado | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Connecticut | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Delaware | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| District of Columbia | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Florida | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 16 | 18 |
| Georgia | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Hawaii | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Idaho | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Illinois | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Indiana | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Iowa | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Kansas | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Kentucky | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Louisiana | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Maine | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 |
| Maryland | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Massachusetts | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Michigan | 15 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 10 |
| Minnesota | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 3 |
| Mississippi | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Missouri | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Montana | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Nebraska | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Nevada | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| New Hampshire | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| New Jersey | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| New Mexico | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| New York | 15 | 4 | 15 | 4 | 15 | 15 | 4 | 4 |
| North Carolina | 12 | 11 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 10 | 14 |
| North Dakota | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 6 |
| Ohio | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 |
| Oklahoma | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Oregon | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Pennsylvania | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 |
| Rhode Island | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| South Carolina | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| South Dakota | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Tennessee | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Texas | 15 | 11 | 15 | 11 | 15 | 11 | 15 | 15 |
| Utah | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Vermont | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Virginia | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Washington | 6 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| West Virginia | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Wisconsin | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Wyoming | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| 1 Number of regions only include the main substate regions and not the aggregate regions. 2 More information on the map regions can be found in Section A.3. 3 The names of some of the substate regions have changed across the time periods. However, as long as the two regions are made of the same counties or tracts, they are included in the count of overlapping regions. Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Surveys on Drug Use and Health, 2008–2016. |
||||||||
The survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes (SWHB) methodology used in the production of state estimates from the 1999 to 2016 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUHs) also was used in the production of the 2014-2016 substate estimates. The SWHB methodology is described by Folsom, Shah, and Vaish (1999). A general model description is given in Section B.1. A brief discussion of the precision of the estimates and interpretation of the Bayesian confidence intervals (CIs) is given in Section B.2. The goals of the small area estimation (SAE) modeling, the general model description, and the implementation of SAE modeling remain the same and are described in Appendix E of the 2001 state report (Wright, 2003).
Small area estimates obtained using the SWHB methodology are design consistent (i.e., for states or substate areas with large sample sizes, the small area estimates are close to the corresponding robust design-based estimates). The substate small area estimates when aggregated by using the appropriate population totals result in national small area estimates that are very close to the national design-based estimates. However, for many reasons, including internal consistency, it is desirable to have the national small area estimates exactly match the national design-based estimates. Beginning in 2002, exact benchmarking was introduced (see Appendix A, Section A.4, in Wright & Sathe, 2005). The 2014-2016 substate small area estimates have been benchmarked to the national design-based estimates.
The model can be characterized as a complex mixed10 model (including both fixed and random effects) of the following form:
, D
where
is the probability of engaging in the behavior of interest (e.g., using marijuana in the past month) for person-k belonging to age group-a in substate region-j of state-i.
Let
denote a
vector of the auxiliary (predictor) variables associated with age group-a (12 to 17, 18 to 25, 26 to 34, and 35 or older) and
denote the associated vector of the regression parameters. The age group-specific vectors of the auxiliary variables are defined for every block group in the nation and also include person-level demographic variables, such as race/ethnicity and gender. The auxiliary variables include block group, census tract, county, and state-level data. These predictor variables include demographic and socioeconomic data from the American Community Survey (ACS), population projections obtained from Claritas,11 food stamp participation rates from the U.S. Census Bureau, Uniform Crime Report (UCR) arrest totals from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), per capita income from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), unemployment rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), mortality rates from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), treatment rates from the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), and Block Grant awards, cost of services, and total taxable resources from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). For a complete list of predictors, refer to Section B of the "2015-2016 NSDUH Guide to State Tables and Summary of Small Area Estimation Methodology" at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/.
The vectors
and
, defined as state- and substate-level random effects, respectively, are assumed to be mutually independent with
and
, where A is the total number of individual age groups modeled (generally,
). For hierarchical Bayes (HB) estimation purposes, an improper uniform prior distribution12 is assumed for
, and proper Wishart prior distributions are assumed for
and
. The HB solution for
involves a series of complex Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) steps to generate values of the desired fixed and random effects from the underlying joint distribution. The basic process is described in Folsom et al. (1999), Shah, Barnwell, Folsom, and Vaish (2000), and Wright (2003). Once the required number of MCMC samples for the parameters of interest are generated and tested for convergence properties (see Raftery & Lewis, 1992), the small area estimates for each age group × race/ethnicity × gender cell within a block group can be obtained. These block group-level small area estimates then can be aggregated using the appropriate population projections to form substate- and state-level small area estimates for the desired age group(s). These small area estimates then are benchmarked to the national design-based estimates (for details on exact benchmarking, see Section B.5 of the "2015-2016 NSDUH Guide to State Tables and Summary of Small Area Estimation Methodology" at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/).
Because the objective here was to produce small area estimates for substate regions, it was decided to ratio adjust the person-level sampling weights to match population projections available from Claritas at the substate × age group × gender level. These adjusted sampling weights are used in the estimation because they reflect the demography of the substate regions better than the unadjusted weights. This ratio adjustment was done at the substate region (406 regions) × age group (12 to 17, 18 to 25, 26 to 34, and 35 or older) × gender (male and female) level collectively over 3 years (2014, 2015, and 2016) of data.
The SAE methodology used here tends to borrow strength from both the national model and the state-level random effects. Estimates for substate regions with smaller sample sizes tend to be shrunk more toward the corresponding state and national prevalence estimates than substate regions with larger sample sizes. This methodology tends to cluster the small sample substate estimates around their state prevalence estimates. Thus, relatively high estimates for substate regions with small sample sizes tend to shrink toward the state prevalence estimates, while relatively low estimates tend to increase toward the state prevalence estimates. On the other hand, for substate regions with large sample sizes, the methodology produces estimates that are close to the weighted average of the sample data in that substate region. In addition, these estimates are design consistent so that, as the sample size for a substate region increases, the estimate approaches the corresponding design-based estimate.
The primary purpose of producing substate estimates is to give policy officials and data users a better perspective on the range of prevalence estimates within and across states. Because the data were collected in a consistent manner by field interviewers who adhered to the same procedures and administered the same questions across all states and substate regions, the results are comparable within and across the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
The 95 percent Bayesian CI associated with each estimate provides a measure of the accuracy of the estimate. It defines the range within which the true value can be expected to fall 95 percent of the time. For example, the estimated prevalence of past month use of marijuana in Region 1 in Alabama is 5.1 percent, and the 95 percent CI ranges from 4.0 to 6.5 percent.13 Therefore, the probability is 0.95 that the true value is within that range. The CI indicates the uncertainty due to both sampling variability and model bias. The key assumption underlying the validity of the CIs is that the state- and substate-level error (or bias correction) terms in the models behave like random effects with zero means and common variance components.
A comparison of the standard errors (SEs) among substate regions with small (n ≤ 500), medium (500 < n ≤ 1,000), and large (n > 1,000) sample sizes for certain measures shows that the small area estimates behave in predictable ways. Regardless of whether the substate region is from a state with a larger annual sample size or one of the other states, the sizes of the CIs are very similar and are primarily a function of the sample size of the substate region and the prevalence estimate of the measure. Substate regions with large sample sizes had the smallest SEs. For past month use of alcohol, where the national prevalence for all individuals aged 12 or older was 51.7 percent (for 2014-2016), the average relative standard error (RSE)14 was about 4.6 percent, and the RSE for substate regions with a large sample size was about 3.0 percent. For substate regions with a medium sample size, the average RSE was 3.9 percent; for small sample sizes, the average RSE was 5.2 percent. For past month use of marijuana (with a national prevalence of 8.5 percent), the average RSE was 9.1 percent for substate regions with large samples. For medium sample sizes, the average RSE was 11.2 percent, and for small samples, the RSE was 13.7 percent, whereas the overall national average RSE was 12.7 percent. Substance use measures with lower prevalence rates, such as past year use of cocaine (1.8 percent nationally), displayed larger average RSEs. For substate regions with large sample sizes, the average RSE was 18.5 percent. For those with medium sample sizes, the average RSE was 22.3 percent, and for those with small sample sizes, the average RSE was 26.4 percent. The overall national RSE for past year use of cocaine was 24.6 percent.
| State/Substate Region | Total Selected DUs |
Total Eligible DUs |
Total Completed Screeners |
Weighted DU Screening Response Rate (Percentage) |
Total Selected |
Total Responded |
Population Estimate |
Weighted Interview Response Rate (Percentage) |
Weighted Overall Response Rate (Percentage) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total United States | 588,564 | 493,010 | 395,003 | 79.83% | 281,746 | 203,916 | 267,494,781 | 69.62% | 55.58% |
| Northeast | 130,212 | 109,845 | 83,084 | 73.82% | 55,945 | 38,736 | 47,754,274 | 65.92% | 48.66% |
| Midwest | 135,800 | 114,520 | 94,528 | 81.59% | 66,524 | 47,738 | 56,630,386 | 69.19% | 56.45% |
| South | 192,981 | 159,911 | 130,205 | 82.66% | 92,574 | 68,382 | 100,115,205 | 71.32% | 58.96% |
| West | 129,571 | 108,734 | 87,186 | 78.16% | 66,703 | 49,060 | 62,994,916 | 70.12% | 54.80% |
| Alabama | 8,433 | 6,746 | 5,587 | 82.74% | 3,992 | 2,900 | 4,066,740 | 68.88% | 56.99% |
| Region 1 | 2,309 | 1,923 | 1,643 | 84.67% | 1,167 | 844 | 1,143,525 | 68.33% | 57.85% |
| Region 2 | 2,693 | 2,201 | 1,687 | 76.94% | 1,245 | 855 | 1,300,200 | 64.48% | 49.61% |
| Region 3 | 1,623 | 1,174 | 1,020 | 86.70% | 728 | 545 | 727,198 | 72.93% | 63.23% |
| Region 4 | 1,808 | 1,448 | 1,237 | 85.70% | 852 | 656 | 895,817 | 73.18% | 62.71% |
| Alaska | 9,546 | 7,113 | 5,743 | 80.61% | 4,084 | 2,888 | 583,292 | 69.48% | 56.01% |
| Anchorage | 3,829 | 3,059 | 2,448 | 79.97% | 1,748 | 1,275 | 239,206 | 70.37% | 56.27% |
| Northern | 2,197 | 1,464 | 1,172 | 79.95% | 855 | 592 | 129,318 | 67.55% | 54.01% |
| South Central | 2,508 | 1,903 | 1,534 | 80.95% | 1,083 | 762 | 153,717 | 70.79% | 57.30% |
| Southeast | 1,012 | 687 | 589 | 83.66% | 398 | 259 | 61,051 | 65.96% | 55.18% |
| Arizona | 8,457 | 6,429 | 5,443 | 84.88% | 3,945 | 2,949 | 5,644,790 | 73.47% | 62.36% |
| Central | 5,037 | 3,991 | 3,348 | 84.27% | 2,501 | 1,860 | 3,371,572 | 72.65% | 61.22% |
| North | 901 | 712 | 616 | 86.59% | 393 | 284 | 681,935 | 72.39% | 62.68% |
| South | 2,519 | 1,726 | 1,479 | 85.59% | 1,051 | 805 | 1,591,283 | 75.90% | 64.97% |
| South A | 1,574 | 1,101 | 954 | 86.75% | 602 | 465 | 870,076 | 77.03% | 66.82% |
| South B | 945 | 625 | 525 | 83.53% | 449 | 340 | 721,207 | 74.34% | 62.10% |
| Arkansas | 8,585 | 7,050 | 5,992 | 85.13% | 3,986 | 2,937 | 2,459,210 | 70.42% | 59.94% |
| Catchment Area 1 | 1,329 | 1,126 | 913 | 81.39% | 655 | 464 | 405,083 | 67.96% | 55.31% |
| Catchment Area 2 | 1,158 | 900 | 738 | 82.45% | 473 | 359 | 297,808 | 74.71% | 61.60% |
| Catchment Area 3 | 1,131 | 922 | 829 | 89.59% | 575 | 442 | 326,336 | 76.04% | 68.13% |
| Catchment Area 4 | 812 | 707 | 605 | 85.84% | 421 | 313 | 216,727 | 70.69% | 60.68% |
| Catchment Area 5 | 1,313 | 1,052 | 923 | 87.54% | 633 | 454 | 367,776 | 66.57% | 58.27% |
| Catchment Area 6 | 749 | 597 | 522 | 87.76% | 315 | 251 | 171,970 | 74.05% | 64.99% |
| Catchment Area 7 | 555 | 437 | 403 | 92.54% | 234 | 185 | 189,124 | 75.72% | 70.07% |
| Catchment Area 8 | 1,538 | 1,309 | 1,059 | 81.08% | 680 | 469 | 484,385 | 65.16% | 52.83% |
| California | 33,713 | 30,426 | 22,640 | 74.04% | 19,568 | 13,954 | 32,482,792 | 67.98% | 50.34% |
| Region 1R | 1,011 | 866 | 729 | 84.55% | 520 | 394 | 817,672 | 74.77% | 63.22% |
| Region 2R | 996 | 845 | 668 | 79.21% | 553 | 421 | 877,839 | 72.74% | 57.62% |
| Region 3R (Sacramento) | 1,500 | 1,371 | 967 | 70.62% | 767 | 580 | 1,229,336 | 72.19% | 50.98% |
| Region 4R | 1,275 | 1,153 | 915 | 79.80% | 691 | 489 | 1,127,236 | 68.12% | 54.36% |
| Region 5R (San Francisco) | 978 | 842 | 552 | 66.40% | 380 | 231 | 766,151 | 56.74% | 37.68% |
| Region 6 (Santa Clara) | 1,666 | 1,537 | 1,205 | 78.54% | 1,065 | 761 | 1,578,447 | 68.44% | 53.75% |
| Region 7R (Contra Costa) | 1,010 | 945 | 732 | 77.56% | 615 | 456 | 930,884 | 71.67% | 55.59% |
| Region 8R (Alameda) | 1,267 | 1,148 | 936 | 81.34% | 735 | 535 | 1,344,459 | 71.07% | 57.81% |
| Region 9R (San Mateo) | 623 | 572 | 479 | 83.73% | 372 | 263 | 637,069 | 69.06% | 57.82% |
| Region 10 | 980 | 864 | 639 | 74.65% | 557 | 374 | 1,078,944 | 64.83% | 48.40% |
| Region 11 (Los Angeles) | 8,376 | 7,815 | 5,656 | 72.73% | 5,106 | 3,443 | 8,495,997 | 63.21% | 45.97% |
| LA SPA 1 and 5 | 873 | 818 | 491 | 61.58% | 451 | 319 | 916,998 | 66.96% | 41.23% |
| LA SPA 2 | 1,878 | 1,766 | 1,253 | 71.08% | 1,170 | 748 | 1,870,818 | 60.16% | 42.76% |
| LA SPA 3 | 1,351 | 1,271 | 898 | 71.16% | 797 | 547 | 1,514,521 | 64.79% | 46.11% |
| LA SPA 4 | 1,052 | 947 | 686 | 72.66% | 499 | 295 | 994,517 | 53.76% | 39.06% |
| LA SPA 6 | 737 | 686 | 571 | 83.83% | 591 | 438 | 816,244 | 71.13% | 59.63% |
| LA SPA 7 | 914 | 870 | 667 | 76.51% | 702 | 465 | 1,075,611 | 63.29% | 48.42% |
| LA SPA 8 | 1,571 | 1,457 | 1,090 | 74.74% | 896 | 631 | 1,307,289 | 64.23% | 48.01% |
| Region 12R | 699 | 603 | 495 | 82.07% | 413 | 314 | 716,288 | 70.62% | 57.96% |
| Regions 13 and 19R | 2,037 | 1,781 | 1,304 | 66.66% | 1,249 | 942 | 2,065,736 | 72.47% | 48.31% |
| Region 14 (Orange) | 2,629 | 2,431 | 1,555 | 62.95% | 1,432 | 937 | 2,678,523 | 60.92% | 38.35% |
| Region 15R (Fresno) | 768 | 697 | 535 | 76.75% | 500 | 362 | 781,651 | 69.67% | 53.47% |
| Region 16R (San Diego) | 3,124 | 2,871 | 1,930 | 67.16% | 1,530 | 1,111 | 2,747,477 | 70.22% | 47.16% |
| Region 17R | 1,571 | 1,358 | 1,132 | 83.71% | 1,012 | 801 | 1,208,114 | 75.20% | 62.95% |
| Region 18R (San Bernardino) | 1,580 | 1,426 | 1,113 | 78.48% | 1,138 | 837 | 1,735,180 | 70.87% | 55.61% |
| Region 20R | 661 | 596 | 516 | 86.51% | 474 | 364 | 787,695 | 75.78% | 65.56% |
| Region 21R | 962 | 705 | 582 | 82.68% | 459 | 339 | 878,093 | 70.69% | 58.45% |
| Colorado | 7,814 | 6,657 | 5,395 | 80.86% | 4,009 | 2,922 | 4,525,628 | 70.75% | 57.21% |
| Region 1 | 1,539 | 1,137 | 932 | 80.96% | 632 | 441 | 751,752 | 70.62% | 57.18% |
| Region 2 | 574 | 486 | 399 | 82.03% | 288 | 205 | 349,899 | 62.59% | 51.35% |
| Region 3 | 1,905 | 1,716 | 1,372 | 80.00% | 1,155 | 844 | 1,177,330 | 69.67% | 55.74% |
| Region 4 | 588 | 446 | 385 | 86.34% | 241 | 190 | 308,602 | 77.30% | 66.75% |
| Region 5 | 908 | 822 | 656 | 79.44% | 504 | 376 | 568,069 | 73.84% | 58.66% |
| Region 6 | 1,332 | 1,233 | 949 | 76.98% | 692 | 500 | 769,114 | 70.38% | 54.17% |
| Region 7 | 968 | 817 | 702 | 86.20% | 497 | 366 | 600,861 | 72.82% | 62.76% |
| Connecticut | 8,642 | 7,561 | 5,864 | 77.60% | 4,241 | 2,881 | 3,055,203 | 65.36% | 50.72% |
| Eastern | 1,185 | 965 | 788 | 81.97% | 529 | 377 | 371,164 | 68.06% | 55.79% |
| North Central | 2,497 | 2,217 | 1,726 | 77.56% | 1,183 | 822 | 854,958 | 66.84% | 51.84% |
| Northwestern | 1,477 | 1,329 | 1,039 | 78.28% | 781 | 535 | 526,857 | 69.98% | 54.78% |
| South Central | 2,058 | 1,763 | 1,419 | 80.49% | 1,018 | 687 | 713,696 | 63.77% | 51.33% |
| Southwest | 1,425 | 1,287 | 892 | 69.63% | 730 | 460 | 588,528 | 58.68% | 40.86% |
| Delaware | 8,426 | 7,199 | 5,491 | 76.48% | 3,917 | 2,824 | 793,943 | 70.82% | 54.16% |
| Kent | 1,517 | 1,326 | 1,067 | 80.49% | 758 | 563 | 143,583 | 71.22% | 57.32% |
| New Castle (excluding Wilmington City) | 4,264 | 3,887 | 2,842 | 73.30% | 2,177 | 1,539 | 406,917 | 70.31% | 51.53% |
| Sussex | 2,104 | 1,522 | 1,226 | 80.72% | 734 | 518 | 179,873 | 69.42% | 56.03% |
| Wilmington City | 541 | 464 | 356 | 77.29% | 248 | 204 | 63,569 | 79.71% | 61.60% |
| District of Columbia | 15,447 | 13,166 | 9,321 | 70.65% | 3,710 | 2,826 | 573,161 | 73.82% | 52.15% |
| Ward 1 | 1,748 | 1,463 | 1,088 | 75.26% | 411 | 300 | 71,811 | 68.08% | 51.24% |
| Ward 2 | 2,493 | 2,137 | 1,238 | 57.97% | 404 | 292 | 76,179 | 70.10% | 40.64% |
| Ward 3 | 1,877 | 1,424 | 1,018 | 71.57% | 411 | 293 | 73,589 | 72.68% | 52.02% |
| Ward 4 | 1,888 | 1,707 | 1,286 | 75.24% | 530 | 395 | 70,867 | 73.58% | 55.36% |
| Ward 5 | 1,677 | 1,486 | 1,053 | 69.88% | 430 | 334 | 72,601 | 74.76% | 52.25% |
| Ward 6 | 2,505 | 2,140 | 1,568 | 73.29% | 569 | 455 | 74,876 | 76.52% | 56.08% |
| Ward 7 | 1,598 | 1,423 | 1,020 | 70.70% | 451 | 362 | 66,937 | 77.99% | 55.14% |
| Ward 8 | 1,661 | 1,386 | 1,050 | 75.71% | 504 | 395 | 66,301 | 75.82% | 57.40% |
| Florida | 32,081 | 25,876 | 20,751 | 80.02% | 13,844 | 10,152 | 17,242,820 | 69.51% | 55.62% |
| Broward (Circuit 17) | 2,647 | 2,056 | 1,544 | 74.58% | 1,052 | 772 | 1,594,764 | 70.64% | 52.69% |
| Central I | 3,856 | 3,402 | 2,916 | 85.80% | 2,173 | 1,627 | 2,176,032 | 72.24% | 61.98% |
| Circuit 9 | 2,154 | 1,946 | 1,684 | 86.75% | 1,395 | 1,066 | 1,296,722 | 73.81% | 64.03% |
| Circuit 18 | 1,702 | 1,456 | 1,232 | 84.65% | 778 | 561 | 879,310 | 70.25% | 59.47% |
| Central II | 9,941 | 7,712 | 6,115 | 78.96% | 3,796 | 2,777 | 4,831,147 | 69.43% | 54.82% |
| Circuit 6 | 2,549 | 2,103 | 1,596 | 74.85% | 1,004 | 686 | 1,266,166 | 65.47% | 49.00% |
| Circuit 10 | 1,351 | 1,130 | 976 | 86.63% | 642 | 520 | 650,370 | 79.61% | 68.97% |
| Circuit 12 | 1,514 | 977 | 773 | 79.64% | 434 | 324 | 691,693 | 75.57% | 60.18% |
| Circuit 13 (Hillsborough) | 2,516 | 2,168 | 1,715 | 79.04% | 1,119 | 820 | 1,138,621 | 68.02% | 53.76% |
| Circuit 20 | 2,011 | 1,334 | 1,055 | 78.60% | 597 | 427 | 1,084,296 | 65.07% | 51.14% |
| Northeast | 5,866 | 4,727 | 3,894 | 82.62% | 2,310 | 1,614 | 3,221,106 | 66.12% | 54.63% |
| Circuit 4 | 1,929 | 1,595 | 1,262 | 79.22% | 761 | 530 | 993,903 | 65.14% | 51.60% |
| Circuit 5 | 1,830 | 1,394 | 1,152 | 82.89% | 655 | 448 | 965,790 | 68.46% | 56.75% |
| Circuit 7 | 1,342 | 1,105 | 927 | 84.31% | 577 | 397 | 788,951 | 61.15% | 51.55% |
| Circuit 8 plus Columbia, Dixie, Hamilton, Lafayette, and Suwannee |
765 | 633 | 553 | 87.24% | 317 | 239 | 472,462 | 72.45% | 63.21% |
| Northwest | 2,470 | 2,032 | 1,738 | 85.63% | 1,205 | 927 | 1,275,635 | 73.94% | 63.31% |
| Circuit 1 | 1,183 | 1,034 | 886 | 85.81% | 603 | 454 | 624,250 | 71.06% | 60.97% |
| Circuit 2 plus Madison and Taylor | 849 | 668 | 567 | 85.28% | 422 | 334 | 388,803 | 76.66% | 65.37% |
| Circuit 14 | 438 | 330 | 285 | 85.75% | 180 | 139 | 262,582 | 77.04% | 66.06% |
| South (Circuits 11 and 16) | 3,853 | 3,253 | 2,494 | 76.30% | 1,900 | 1,422 | 2,378,649 | 70.75% | 53.99% |
| Southeast | 3,448 | 2,694 | 2,050 | 76.45% | 1,408 | 1,013 | 1,765,488 | 66.15% | 50.58% |
| Circuit 15 (Palm Beach) | 2,294 | 1,802 | 1,328 | 74.30% | 954 | 667 | 1,213,150 | 63.74% | 47.36% |
| Circuit 19 | 1,154 | 892 | 722 | 80.89% | 454 | 346 | 552,337 | 71.18% | 57.58% |
| Georgia | 11,327 | 9,535 | 7,613 | 79.83% | 6,019 | 4,555 | 8,354,200 | 72.40% | 57.80% |
| Region 1 | 2,724 | 2,365 | 1,990 | 84.12% | 1,547 | 1,119 | 2,154,037 | 69.26% | 58.27% |
| Region 2 | 1,633 | 1,376 | 1,137 | 82.85% | 870 | 676 | 1,069,386 | 73.31% | 60.74% |
| Region 3 | 3,536 | 3,019 | 2,195 | 72.66% | 1,887 | 1,407 | 2,498,830 | 71.14% | 51.69% |
| Region 4 | 681 | 568 | 497 | 87.43% | 337 | 285 | 515,403 | 83.94% | 73.39% |
| Region 5 | 1,257 | 961 | 789 | 81.95% | 620 | 489 | 949,323 | 76.48% | 62.68% |
| Region 6 | 1,496 | 1,246 | 1,005 | 80.42% | 758 | 579 | 1,167,221 | 73.09% | 58.78% |
| Hawaii | 10,030 | 8,428 | 6,371 | 75.28% | 4,186 | 2,992 | 1,162,034 | 69.58% | 52.38% |
| Hawaii Island | 1,512 | 1,227 | 1,069 | 86.51% | 640 | 476 | 155,455 | 73.18% | 63.31% |
| Honolulu | 6,745 | 5,691 | 4,045 | 71.05% | 2,740 | 1,956 | 818,697 | 68.81% | 48.89% |
| Kauai | 638 | 544 | 468 | 86.15% | 317 | 230 | 56,499 | 74.09% | 63.83% |
| Maui | 1,135 | 966 | 789 | 81.69% | 489 | 330 | 131,383 | 67.37% | 55.03% |
| Idaho | 6,605 | 5,654 | 4,849 | 85.84% | 3,973 | 3,024 | 1,351,967 | 74.17% | 63.67% |
| Region 1 | 1,047 | 817 | 633 | 78.61% | 463 | 305 | 189,702 | 64.11% | 50.39% |
| Region 2 | 441 | 380 | 315 | 82.90% | 231 | 180 | 94,958 | 77.36% | 64.13% |
| Region 3 | 1,056 | 949 | 821 | 86.25% | 731 | 566 | 213,811 | 75.76% | 65.35% |
| Region 4 | 1,815 | 1,652 | 1,427 | 86.46% | 1,121 | 866 | 389,716 | 75.90% | 65.62% |
| Region 5 | 880 | 715 | 638 | 88.72% | 529 | 421 | 155,306 | 77.97% | 69.17% |
| Region 6 | 438 | 352 | 308 | 87.65% | 259 | 186 | 100,522 | 69.16% | 60.62% |
| Region 7 | 928 | 789 | 707 | 89.89% | 639 | 500 | 207,951 | 75.13% | 67.54% |
| Illinois | 21,229 | 18,462 | 13,547 | 73.46% | 10,869 | 7,229 | 10,726,139 | 64.08% | 47.08% |
| Region 1 (Cook) | 8,592 | 7,394 | 4,692 | 63.86% | 3,936 | 2,539 | 4,372,169 | 62.36% | 39.83% |
| Region 1.1 (Far North Side) | 771 | 702 | 433 | 61.82% | 284 | 172 | 401,000 | 62.16% | 38.43% |
| Region 1.2 (Northwest Side) | 463 | 402 | 281 | 70.43% | 266 | 156 | 226,723 | 56.71% | 39.95% |
| Region 1.3 (North Central Side) | 923 | 784 | 300 | 38.96% | 234 | 133 | 401,961 | 57.82% | 22.52% |
| Region 1.4 (West Side) | 938 | 787 | 353 | 43.97% | 315 | 222 | 392,394 | 65.81% | 28.94% |
| Region 1.5 (South Side) | 822 | 675 | 413 | 61.82% | 372 | 251 | 551,374 | 69.79% | 43.15% |
| Region 1.6 (Southwest Side) | 821 | 688 | 424 | 61.81% | 434 | 273 | 303,419 | 59.90% | 37.03% |
| Region 1.7 (Suburban Cook) | 3,854 | 3,356 | 2,488 | 74.38% | 2,031 | 1,332 | 2,095,299 | 62.15% | 46.23% |
| Region 2 | 6,289 | 5,758 | 4,386 | 75.95% | 3,697 | 2,449 | 3,393,930 | 63.84% | 48.49% |
| Region 2a (DuPage) | 1,502 | 1,403 | 991 | 70.74% | 833 | 518 | 782,530 | 59.24% | 41.91% |
| Region 2b | 3,183 | 2,914 | 2,312 | 79.33% | 2,057 | 1,375 | 1,820,605 | 64.45% | 51.13% |
| Region 2c (Winnebago) | 559 | 502 | 364 | 70.06% | 231 | 166 | 239,220 | 73.71% | 51.64% |
| Region 2d | 1,045 | 939 | 719 | 76.59% | 576 | 390 | 551,575 | 65.16% | 49.90% |
| Region 3 | 2,596 | 2,210 | 1,881 | 85.11% | 1,419 | 960 | 1,208,296 | 64.79% | 55.15% |
| Region 3a (Champaign) | 357 | 322 | 276 | 85.31% | 229 | 154 | 172,198 | 64.26% | 54.82% |
| Region 3b | 2,239 | 1,888 | 1,605 | 85.08% | 1,190 | 806 | 1,036,097 | 64.89% | 55.21% |
| Region 4 | 1,639 | 1,393 | 1,208 | 86.82% | 820 | 584 | 753,290 | 69.65% | 60.46% |
| Region 4a (Sangamon) | 369 | 324 | 277 | 85.76% | 190 | 138 | 167,678 | 72.32% | 62.02% |
| Region 4b | 1,270 | 1,069 | 931 | 87.14% | 630 | 446 | 585,612 | 68.91% | 60.05% |
| Region 5 | 2,113 | 1,707 | 1,380 | 81.11% | 997 | 697 | 998,455 | 67.52% | 54.76% |
| Region 5a | 875 | 684 | 539 | 78.80% | 382 | 274 | 444,704 | 69.76% | 54.97% |
| Region 5b | 1,238 | 1,023 | 841 | 82.64% | 615 | 423 | 553,751 | 66.19% | 54.70% |
| Indiana | 7,793 | 6,519 | 5,266 | 80.79% | 3,956 | 2,873 | 5,483,151 | 69.99% | 56.55% |
| Central | 2,193 | 1,972 | 1,480 | 75.15% | 1,194 | 856 | 1,455,692 | 70.38% | 52.89% |
| East | 644 | 485 | 426 | 87.89% | 314 | 232 | 459,504 | 72.55% | 63.77% |
| North Central | 1,089 | 907 | 752 | 82.61% | 519 | 391 | 769,741 | 72.96% | 60.28% |
| Northeast | 752 | 653 | 552 | 84.38% | 415 | 304 | 540,515 | 70.62% | 59.59% |
| Northwest | 799 | 677 | 556 | 81.93% | 471 | 332 | 620,599 | 62.56% | 51.26% |
| Southeast | 840 | 706 | 603 | 85.56% | 425 | 305 | 588,921 | 70.81% | 60.58% |
| Southwest | 604 | 529 | 411 | 78.03% | 274 | 206 | 428,875 | 71.73% | 55.97% |
| West | 872 | 590 | 486 | 82.17% | 344 | 247 | 619,304 | 67.81% | 55.72% |
| Iowa | 8,457 | 7,230 | 6,192 | 85.61% | 4,011 | 2,902 | 2,597,970 | 70.57% | 60.41% |
| Central | 1,557 | 1,374 | 1,121 | 81.57% | 765 | 529 | 472,094 | 66.89% | 54.57% |
| North Central | 978 | 799 | 686 | 85.80% | 438 | 320 | 287,303 | 70.40% | 60.40% |
| Northeast | 1,979 | 1,746 | 1,515 | 86.75% | 1,016 | 734 | 631,363 | 71.09% | 61.67% |
| Northwest | 1,318 | 1,101 | 1,010 | 91.80% | 602 | 445 | 394,239 | 69.87% | 64.15% |
| Southeast | 1,881 | 1,620 | 1,336 | 82.25% | 854 | 625 | 551,512 | 72.10% | 59.31% |
| Southwest | 744 | 590 | 524 | 89.00% | 336 | 249 | 261,459 | 74.40% | 66.22% |
| Kansas | 7,466 | 6,477 | 5,515 | 85.10% | 4,010 | 2,964 | 2,364,482 | 72.14% | 61.39% |
| Northeast | 3,697 | 3,312 | 2,673 | 80.50% | 2,026 | 1,485 | 1,182,405 | 71.29% | 57.39% |
| Northwest and North Central | 551 | 457 | 407 | 89.17% | 243 | 168 | 188,357 | 69.46% | 61.94% |
| South Central | 2,249 | 1,912 | 1,713 | 89.72% | 1,225 | 928 | 681,690 | 74.69% | 67.01% |
| Southeast | 510 | 415 | 375 | 90.32% | 252 | 182 | 175,731 | 65.82% | 59.44% |
| Southwest | 459 | 381 | 347 | 91.30% | 264 | 201 | 136,298 | 76.56% | 69.90% |
| Kentucky | 8,187 | 6,666 | 5,626 | 84.54% | 4,000 | 2,837 | 3,668,395 | 67.98% | 57.47% |
| Adanta, Cumberland River, and Lifeskills | 1,413 | 1,088 | 942 | 87.04% | 641 | 438 | 614,496 | 66.01% | 57.46% |
| Bluegrass, Comprehend, and North Key | 2,408 | 1,992 | 1,707 | 85.86% | 1,249 | 874 | 1,078,518 | 67.22% | 57.71% |
| Centerstone | 1,805 | 1,532 | 1,294 | 84.31% | 905 | 706 | 814,353 | 72.59% | 61.20% |
| Communicare and River Valley | 723 | 609 | 531 | 87.29% | 397 | 263 | 408,784 | 61.58% | 53.75% |
| Four Rivers and Pennyroyal | 834 | 693 | 553 | 79.51% | 366 | 257 | 343,762 | 69.32% | 55.12% |
| Kentucky River, Mountain, and Pathways | 1,004 | 752 | 599 | 80.33% | 442 | 299 | 408,482 | 68.42% | 54.96% |
| Louisiana | 7,999 | 6,538 | 5,480 | 84.25% | 3,912 | 2,908 | 3,816,673 | 72.37% | 60.97% |
| Regions 1 and 10 | 1,541 | 1,311 | 1,083 | 83.26% | 776 | 568 | 746,613 | 70.59% | 58.77% |
| Region 1 | 657 | 527 | 446 | 85.04% | 319 | 244 | 389,722 | 76.99% | 65.47% |
| Region 10 (Jefferson) | 884 | 784 | 637 | 82.44% | 457 | 324 | 356,891 | 67.17% | 55.37% |
| Regions 2 and 9 | 2,163 | 1,809 | 1,519 | 84.62% | 1,105 | 816 | 1,013,680 | 75.82% | 64.16% |
| Region 3 | 744 | 637 | 563 | 88.53% | 410 | 328 | 327,511 | 77.86% | 68.93% |
| Regions 4, 5, and 6 | 2,038 | 1,572 | 1,267 | 80.71% | 897 | 629 | 979,634 | 66.21% | 53.44% |
| Regions 7 and 8 | 1,513 | 1,209 | 1,048 | 87.24% | 724 | 567 | 749,235 | 73.89% | 64.46% |
| Maine | 11,560 | 8,526 | 7,222 | 84.98% | 4,024 | 2,926 | 1,155,877 | 71.91% | 61.10% |
| Aroostook/Downeast | 1,528 | 1,036 | 937 | 90.88% | 520 | 407 | 138,205 | 79.60% | 72.34% |
| Aroostook | 740 | 547 | 490 | 90.10% | 294 | 240 | 61,755 | 83.31% | 75.07% |
| Downeast | 788 | 489 | 447 | 91.70% | 226 | 167 | 76,450 | 74.61% | 68.41% |
| Central | 1,382 | 1,038 | 854 | 82.70% | 445 | 340 | 150,204 | 76.56% | 63.31% |
| Cumberland | 2,435 | 1,943 | 1,596 | 82.49% | 975 | 654 | 248,377 | 68.13% | 56.20% |
| Midcoast | 1,210 | 883 | 756 | 85.86% | 396 | 294 | 128,172 | 72.63% | 62.36% |
| Penquis | 1,435 | 1,083 | 965 | 89.42% | 473 | 359 | 149,029 | 75.37% | 67.39% |
| Western | 1,869 | 1,292 | 1,087 | 84.54% | 615 | 454 | 167,659 | 71.38% | 60.34% |
| York | 1,701 | 1,251 | 1,027 | 81.81% | 600 | 418 | 174,230 | 65.35% | 53.46% |
| Maryland | 7,209 | 6,389 | 4,820 | 74.94% | 3,904 | 2,907 | 5,011,465 | 71.70% | 53.73% |
| Anne Arundel | 658 | 609 | 450 | 72.95% | 372 | 278 | 471,453 | 73.44% | 53.58% |
| Baltimore City | 982 | 812 | 633 | 77.89% | 495 | 388 | 518,452 | 76.60% | 59.67% |
| Baltimore County | 934 | 831 | 554 | 65.85% | 401 | 292 | 698,887 | 70.41% | 46.37% |
| Montgomery | 1,194 | 1,115 | 834 | 73.77% | 706 | 534 | 860,532 | 73.79% | 54.44% |
| North Central | 609 | 566 | 442 | 77.93% | 351 | 255 | 402,195 | 68.74% | 53.56% |
| Northeast | 594 | 520 | 413 | 78.91% | 325 | 224 | 419,191 | 67.23% | 53.05% |
| Prince George's | 942 | 870 | 603 | 69.42% | 540 | 385 | 736,311 | 67.62% | 46.94% |
| South | 638 | 558 | 463 | 82.87% | 357 | 278 | 480,838 | 74.88% | 62.05% |
| West | 658 | 508 | 428 | 84.22% | 357 | 273 | 423,607 | 70.79% | 59.62% |
| Massachusetts | 10,014 | 8,753 | 6,564 | 75.36% | 4,624 | 2,936 | 5,813,831 | 62.04% | 46.75% |
| Boston | 1,201 | 1,056 | 694 | 66.34% | 540 | 336 | 730,029 | 59.66% | 39.58% |
| Central | 1,235 | 1,137 | 867 | 76.34% | 618 | 390 | 749,026 | 62.50% | 47.72% |
| Metrowest | 2,203 | 2,033 | 1,514 | 74.74% | 1,036 | 643 | 1,352,593 | 60.69% | 45.35% |
| Northeast | 2,016 | 1,898 | 1,474 | 78.00% | 1,095 | 706 | 1,144,574 | 62.23% | 48.54% |
| Southeast | 2,049 | 1,508 | 1,180 | 77.94% | 778 | 498 | 1,109,094 | 63.59% | 49.56% |
| Western | 1,310 | 1,121 | 835 | 75.43% | 557 | 363 | 728,515 | 63.44% | 47.86% |
| Michigan | 20,865 | 17,084 | 14,160 | 82.78% | 9,963 | 7,279 | 8,390,651 | 70.32% | 58.22% |
| Region 1 | 913 | 625 | 541 | 86.61% | 332 | 245 | 273,965 | 71.09% | 61.57% |
| Region 2 | 1,086 | 733 | 612 | 83.58% | 350 | 244 | 439,495 | 70.09% | 58.59% |
| Region 3 | 2,268 | 1,983 | 1,676 | 84.38% | 1,336 | 1,013 | 1,033,763 | 73.73% | 62.21% |
| Region 4 | 1,888 | 1,603 | 1,359 | 84.13% | 952 | 727 | 708,970 | 74.97% | 63.06% |
| Region 5 | 3,920 | 3,013 | 2,585 | 85.82% | 1,747 | 1,365 | 1,408,645 | 76.76% | 65.88% |
| Region 6 | 1,346 | 1,191 | 981 | 82.47% | 746 | 562 | 680,057 | 72.11% | 59.47% |
| Region 7 | 3,627 | 2,865 | 2,236 | 77.84% | 1,661 | 1,160 | 1,471,779 | 65.75% | 51.18% |
| Region 8 | 2,540 | 2,316 | 1,847 | 79.75% | 1,257 | 860 | 1,056,401 | 66.75% | 53.23% |
| Region 9 | 1,690 | 1,556 | 1,279 | 81.99% | 908 | 600 | 724,098 | 61.26% | 50.23% |
| Region 10 | 1,587 | 1,199 | 1,044 | 87.13% | 674 | 503 | 593,478 | 71.10% | 61.95% |
| Minnesota | 7,461 | 6,538 | 5,446 | 83.28% | 3,927 | 2,880 | 4,574,972 | 72.39% | 60.29% |
| Regions 1 and 2 | 959 | 730 | 601 | 82.13% | 375 | 256 | 454,682 | 67.60% | 55.52% |
| Region 1 | 402 | 333 | 258 | 76.79% | 162 | 106 | 171,843 | 65.83% | 50.55% |
| Region 2 | 557 | 397 | 343 | 86.45% | 213 | 150 | 282,840 | 68.82% | 59.50% |
| Regions 3 and 4 | 1,435 | 1,170 | 998 | 85.32% | 714 | 529 | 778,084 | 74.61% | 63.66% |
| Region 3 | 339 | 259 | 215 | 83.06% | 161 | 118 | 271,946 | 74.14% | 61.58% |
| Region 4 | 1,096 | 911 | 783 | 86.00% | 553 | 411 | 506,138 | 74.75% | 64.28% |
| Regions 5 and 6 | 1,191 | 1,032 | 913 | 88.51% | 699 | 490 | 847,281 | 68.01% | 60.20% |
| Region 5 | 589 | 501 | 450 | 89.83% | 377 | 272 | 428,215 | 68.62% | 61.64% |
| Region 6 | 602 | 531 | 463 | 87.27% | 322 | 218 | 419,066 | 67.29% | 58.72% |
| Region 7 | 3,876 | 3,606 | 2,934 | 81.34% | 2,139 | 1,605 | 2,494,926 | 73.80% | 60.03% |
| Region 7A (Hennepin) | 1,624 | 1,534 | 1,230 | 80.19% | 925 | 690 | 1,023,049 | 75.17% | 60.28% |
| Region 7B (Ramsey) | 742 | 661 | 548 | 82.89% | 395 | 305 | 447,005 | 77.22% | 64.00% |
| Region 7C | 1,510 | 1,411 | 1,156 | 81.84% | 819 | 610 | 1,024,872 | 70.98% | 58.09% |
| Mississippi | 7,135 | 5,723 | 4,856 | 84.99% | 3,710 | 2,764 | 2,447,101 | 72.55% | 61.66% |
| Region 1 | 1,587 | 1,328 | 1,160 | 87.49% | 925 | 692 | 556,236 | 73.32% | 64.14% |
| Region 2 | 900 | 648 | 518 | 79.86% | 385 | 316 | 298,326 | 76.60% | 61.17% |
| Region 3 | 998 | 793 | 704 | 88.90% | 526 | 393 | 341,474 | 71.21% | 63.30% |
| Region 4 | 1,230 | 1,077 | 851 | 79.03% | 688 | 507 | 454,881 | 73.95% | 58.44% |
| Region 5 | 436 | 292 | 261 | 90.09% | 189 | 137 | 147,446 | 71.48% | 64.39% |
| Region 6 | 906 | 717 | 659 | 91.99% | 479 | 364 | 253,078 | 73.75% | 67.85% |
| Region 7 | 1,078 | 868 | 703 | 81.37% | 518 | 355 | 395,660 | 66.70% | 54.27% |
| Missouri | 7,772 | 6,457 | 5,611 | 86.84% | 3,894 | 2,858 | 5,053,610 | 70.60% | 61.31% |
| Central | 1,066 | 840 | 746 | 88.85% | 498 | 361 | 686,509 | 70.27% | 62.43% |
| Eastern | 2,690 | 2,327 | 2,043 | 87.77% | 1,382 | 1,018 | 1,756,158 | 70.85% | 62.18% |
| Eastern (St. Louis City and County) | 1,606 | 1,328 | 1,160 | 87.33% | 768 | 580 | 1,104,367 | 73.46% | 64.16% |
| Eastern (excluding St. Louis) | 1,084 | 999 | 883 | 88.34% | 614 | 438 | 651,791 | 67.84% | 59.93% |
| Northwest | 1,891 | 1,598 | 1,358 | 84.83% | 966 | 722 | 1,224,829 | 72.21% | 61.26% |
| Northwest (Jackson) | 957 | 822 | 681 | 82.47% | 509 | 391 | 559,340 | 73.19% | 60.37% |
| Northwest (excluding Jackson) | 934 | 776 | 677 | 87.31% | 457 | 331 | 665,490 | 71.19% | 62.16% |
| Southeast | 848 | 685 | 606 | 88.51% | 441 | 343 | 598,268 | 75.10% | 66.48% |
| Southwest | 1,277 | 1,007 | 858 | 85.15% | 607 | 414 | 787,845 | 65.23% | 55.54% |
| Montana | 9,241 | 7,400 | 6,442 | 87.27% | 4,049 | 2,972 | 867,472 | 71.00% | 61.96% |
| Region 1 | 658 | 412 | 389 | 94.67% | 271 | 209 | 68,591 | 76.91% | 72.82% |
| Region 2 | 1,409 | 1,145 | 1,019 | 88.97% | 629 | 471 | 122,807 | 70.77% | 62.97% |
| Region 3 | 2,005 | 1,728 | 1,468 | 85.09% | 905 | 651 | 179,688 | 71.84% | 61.14% |
| Region 4 | 2,380 | 1,874 | 1,613 | 86.41% | 1,049 | 748 | 230,640 | 69.56% | 60.10% |
| Region 5 | 2,789 | 2,241 | 1,953 | 87.42% | 1,195 | 893 | 265,746 | 70.66% | 61.77% |
| Nebraska | 7,665 | 6,608 | 5,517 | 83.50% | 3,933 | 2,847 | 1,547,666 | 71.18% | 59.44% |
| Regions 1 and 2 | 808 | 653 | 576 | 88.40% | 328 | 235 | 156,621 | 70.52% | 62.34% |
| Region 1 | 406 | 318 | 277 | 86.98% | 168 | 121 | 73,417 | 70.53% | 61.34% |
| Region 2 | 402 | 335 | 299 | 89.84% | 160 | 114 | 83,205 | 70.51% | 63.35% |
| Region 3 | 1,072 | 912 | 815 | 89.43% | 553 | 418 | 190,009 | 74.54% | 66.66% |
| Region 4 | 798 | 669 | 616 | 92.09% | 430 | 307 | 170,599 | 66.68% | 61.40% |
| Region 5 | 1,831 | 1,576 | 1,324 | 84.29% | 866 | 639 | 383,101 | 72.61% | 61.21% |
| Region 6 | 3,156 | 2,798 | 2,186 | 77.86% | 1,756 | 1,248 | 647,336 | 70.54% | 54.92% |
| Nevada | 7,476 | 6,429 | 4,864 | 75.54% | 3,864 | 2,924 | 2,405,650 | 71.78% | 54.23% |
| Clark – Region 1 | 5,321 | 4,622 | 3,443 | 74.34% | 2,794 | 2,128 | 1,735,247 | 71.81% | 53.38% |
| Region 3 | 939 | 732 | 588 | 80.28% | 388 | 272 | 294,972 | 66.88% | 53.69% |
| Capital District | 304 | 264 | 200 | 75.15% | 136 | 97 | 140,001 | 64.62% | 48.56% |
| Rural/Frontier | 635 | 468 | 388 | 83.41% | 252 | 175 | 154,971 | 68.57% | 57.19% |
| Washoe – Region 2 | 1,216 | 1,075 | 833 | 77.48% | 682 | 524 | 375,432 | 74.86% | 58.00% |
| New Hampshire | 9,612 | 7,965 | 6,394 | 80.22% | 4,078 | 2,863 | 1,151,028 | 68.07% | 54.61% |
| Central | 2,965 | 2,506 | 2,098 | 83.73% | 1,396 | 1,011 | 326,910 | 69.81% | 58.45% |
| Central 1 | 1,373 | 1,124 | 952 | 84.79% | 642 | 463 | 161,866 | 69.43% | 58.87% |
| Central 2 | 1,592 | 1,382 | 1,146 | 82.86% | 754 | 548 | 165,044 | 70.15% | 58.12% |
| Northern | 1,677 | 1,012 | 825 | 80.84% | 442 | 333 | 148,941 | 71.43% | 57.74% |
| Southern | 4,970 | 4,447 | 3,471 | 78.13% | 2,240 | 1,519 | 675,177 | 66.38% | 51.86% |
| Southern 1 (Rockingham) | 1,812 | 1,653 | 1,262 | 76.66% | 793 | 521 | 260,103 | 66.55% | 51.01% |
| Southern 2 | 3,158 | 2,794 | 2,209 | 78.98% | 1,447 | 998 | 415,074 | 66.28% | 52.35% |
| New Jersey | 12,849 | 11,258 | 8,549 | 75.30% | 6,563 | 4,486 | 7,541,739 | 66.11% | 49.78% |
| Central | 2,964 | 2,620 | 1,951 | 72.13% | 1,492 | 976 | 1,730,180 | 64.23% | 46.33% |
| Metropolitan | 3,130 | 2,696 | 2,004 | 74.27% | 1,506 | 1,015 | 1,820,453 | 64.98% | 48.27% |
| Northern | 4,212 | 3,743 | 2,880 | 76.81% | 2,249 | 1,556 | 2,426,107 | 65.18% | 50.06% |
| Southern | 2,543 | 2,199 | 1,714 | 77.96% | 1,316 | 939 | 1,565,000 | 71.26% | 55.56% |
| New Mexico | 7,788 | 5,622 | 4,919 | 87.64% | 3,647 | 2,898 | 1,721,763 | 77.80% | 68.18% |
| Region 1 | 1,344 | 1,047 | 918 | 87.94% | 731 | 594 | 358,976 | 78.36% | 68.91% |
| Region 2 | 976 | 664 | 581 | 87.98% | 414 | 347 | 248,007 | 80.11% | 70.47% |
| Region 3 (Bernalillo) | 2,520 | 1,991 | 1,700 | 85.29% | 1,254 | 971 | 559,940 | 77.19% | 65.83% |
| Region 4 | 872 | 675 | 615 | 91.31% | 479 | 378 | 214,196 | 74.48% | 68.01% |
| Region 5 | 2,076 | 1,245 | 1,105 | 88.91% | 769 | 608 | 340,644 | 78.81% | 70.07% |
| Region 5a | 1,378 | 693 | 612 | 88.69% | 378 | 301 | 161,878 | 77.95% | 69.13% |
| Region 5b (Dona Ana) | 698 | 552 | 493 | 89.21% | 391 | 307 | 178,766 | 79.92% | 71.29% |
| New York | 35,578 | 30,774 | 20,398 | 65.88% | 14,732 | 9,826 | 16,748,149 | 63.04% | 41.53% |
| Region 1: Long Island | 4,668 | 4,134 | 2,799 | 67.65% | 2,266 | 1,369 | 2,434,332 | 57.39% | 38.83% |
| Region 2: New York City | 14,905 | 13,215 | 7,850 | 58.74% | 6,058 | 3,742 | 7,202,566 | 57.98% | 34.06% |
| Region 2A: Bronx | 2,292 | 2,137 | 1,517 | 71.00% | 1,197 | 885 | 1,171,688 | 71.88% | 51.03% |
| Region 2B: Kings | 4,226 | 3,659 | 2,313 | 63.32% | 1,785 | 1,035 | 2,180,764 | 54.68% | 34.62% |
| Region 2C: New York | 3,998 | 3,431 | 1,709 | 48.01% | 1,171 | 744 | 1,467,390 | 61.25% | 29.40% |
| Region 2D: Queens | 3,614 | 3,297 | 1,843 | 55.96% | 1,537 | 846 | 1,981,210 | 51.51% | 28.82% |
| Region 2E: Richmond | 775 | 691 | 468 | 68.15% | 368 | 232 | 401,513 | 59.45% | 40.52% |
| Region 3: Mid-Hudson | 4,331 | 3,705 | 2,359 | 63.52% | 1,646 | 1,071 | 1,955,838 | 61.75% | 39.22% |
| Region 4: Capital Region | 1,519 | 1,276 | 925 | 72.78% | 641 | 474 | 812,980 | 74.06% | 53.90% |
| Region 5: Mohawk Valley | 367 | 251 | 207 | 82.61% | 153 | 116 | 222,088 | 78.03% | 64.47% |
| Region 6: North Country | 673 | 472 | 382 | 79.94% | 213 | 166 | 263,280 | 77.23% | 61.74% |
| Region 7: Tug Hill Seaway | 691 | 489 | 419 | 85.71% | 275 | 216 | 214,345 | 75.50% | 64.72% |
| Region 8: Central | 2,008 | 1,647 | 1,239 | 75.35% | 807 | 636 | 866,864 | 77.11% | 58.10% |
| Region 9: Southern Tier | 860 | 693 | 553 | 79.56% | 341 | 287 | 382,701 | 81.89% | 65.15% |
| Region 10: Finger Lakes | 2,328 | 2,058 | 1,525 | 73.93% | 971 | 722 | 1,085,658 | 71.52% | 52.87% |
| Region 11: Western | 3,228 | 2,834 | 2,140 | 75.64% | 1,361 | 1,027 | 1,307,498 | 71.36% | 53.98% |
| North Carolina | 12,558 | 10,519 | 8,794 | 83.54% | 6,170 | 4,617 | 8,318,964 | 72.62% | 60.67% |
| Alliance Behavioral Healthcare 1 | 1,261 | 1,054 | 911 | 86.33% | 655 | 500 | 657,907 | 73.18% | 63.18% |
| Alliance Behavioral Healthcare 2 | 1,015 | 898 | 755 | 84.15% | 549 | 416 | 820,197 | 73.50% | 61.85% |
| Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions 1 | 944 | 840 | 683 | 81.08% | 500 | 340 | 632,700 | 66.16% | 53.64% |
| Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions 2 | 742 | 623 | 543 | 87.15% | 376 | 283 | 568,160 | 73.41% | 63.98% |
| Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions 3 | 1,224 | 1,064 | 842 | 79.09% | 612 | 447 | 822,355 | 70.22% | 55.54% |
| CenterPoint Human Services | 817 | 679 | 555 | 81.70% | 380 | 295 | 459,622 | 76.49% | 62.49% |
| Eastpointe | 1,244 | 1,095 | 920 | 84.21% | 649 | 493 | 691,059 | 73.60% | 61.98% |
| Partners Behavioral Health Management | 914 | 785 | 665 | 84.66% | 465 | 355 | 768,880 | 71.83% | 60.81% |
| Sandhills Center 1 | 519 | 439 | 367 | 83.59% | 253 | 191 | 479,961 | 76.22% | 63.71% |
| Sandhills Center 2 | 680 | 597 | 480 | 80.56% | 355 | 264 | 432,615 | 71.90% | 57.92% |
| Smoky Mountain Center 1 | 881 | 641 | 546 | 85.21% | 370 | 269 | 460,631 | 71.51% | 60.93% |
| Smoky Mountain Center 2 | 773 | 644 | 545 | 84.57% | 313 | 228 | 458,990 | 72.78% | 61.55% |
| Trillium Health Resources 1 | 949 | 704 | 588 | 82.90% | 443 | 361 | 524,436 | 78.10% | 64.75% |
| Trillium Health Resources 2 | 595 | 456 | 394 | 86.16% | 250 | 175 | 541,448 | 68.82% | 59.30% |
| North Dakota | 9,979 | 8,003 | 7,141 | 89.28% | 3,926 | 2,917 | 617,037 | 72.96% | 65.14% |
| Badlands and West Central | 2,704 | 2,129 | 2,001 | 94.05% | 1,090 | 807 | 165,469 | 72.78% | 68.45% |
| Badlands | 567 | 389 | 368 | 94.52% | 181 | 132 | 37,436 | 73.69% | 69.65% |
| West Central | 2,137 | 1,740 | 1,633 | 93.94% | 909 | 675 | 128,033 | 72.59% | 68.19% |
| Lake Region | 681 | 500 | 447 | 89.34% | 224 | 172 | 34,469 | 78.01% | 69.69% |
| North Central | 1,267 | 963 | 854 | 88.47% | 460 | 347 | 86,655 | 73.46% | 65.00% |
| Northeast | 1,403 | 1,178 | 1,014 | 86.31% | 574 | 426 | 77,789 | 71.56% | 61.77% |
| Northwest | 448 | 301 | 266 | 88.77% | 171 | 111 | 33,304 | 60.87% | 54.03% |
| South Central | 842 | 600 | 539 | 89.37% | 241 | 173 | 48,790 | 75.08% | 67.10% |
| Southeast | 2,634 | 2,332 | 2,020 | 86.73% | 1,166 | 881 | 170,560 | 73.92% | 64.11% |
| Ohio | 20,158 | 17,139 | 14,004 | 81.70% | 10,158 | 7,220 | 9,725,850 | 68.62% | 56.06% |
| Boards 2, 46, 55, and 68 | 674 | 588 | 492 | 83.62% | 376 | 256 | 428,775 | 64.61% | 54.03% |
| Boards 3, 52, and 85 | 527 | 488 | 397 | 81.47% | 309 | 219 | 320,796 | 73.43% | 59.83% |
| Boards 4 and 78 | 602 | 502 | 437 | 87.11% | 297 | 226 | 261,594 | 76.24% | 66.42% |
| Boards 5 and 60 | 495 | 427 | 388 | 90.75% | 297 | 213 | 287,227 | 70.42% | 63.91% |
| Boards 7, 15, 41, 79, and 84 | 839 | 713 | 555 | 77.51% | 369 | 238 | 390,557 | 62.26% | 48.25% |
| Boards 8, 13, and 83 | 628 | 576 | 456 | 79.05% | 332 | 230 | 422,162 | 64.41% | 50.92% |
| Board 9 (Butler) | 660 | 584 | 475 | 81.39% | 356 | 229 | 310,689 | 62.01% | 50.47% |
| Board 12 | 721 | 570 | 405 | 71.43% | 305 | 213 | 293,200 | 68.71% | 49.08% |
| Boards 18 and 47 | 2,791 | 2,357 | 1,849 | 78.39% | 1,275 | 923 | 1,315,794 | 70.35% | 55.15% |
| Boards 20, 32, 54, and 69 | 762 | 672 | 619 | 91.97% | 426 | 311 | 286,136 | 71.80% | 66.03% |
| Boards 21, 39, 51, 70, and 80 | 640 | 559 | 493 | 88.22% | 426 | 315 | 468,487 | 71.65% | 63.21% |
| Boards 22, 74, and 87 | 897 | 607 | 537 | 88.37% | 401 | 301 | 328,042 | 71.24% | 62.95% |
| Boards 23 and 45 | 736 | 629 | 542 | 86.28% | 465 | 324 | 317,970 | 65.97% | 56.92% |
| Board 25 (Franklin) | 2,115 | 1,867 | 1,441 | 77.42% | 1,118 | 790 | 1,007,348 | 68.67% | 53.16% |
| Boards 27, 71, and 73 | 917 | 706 | 572 | 80.78% | 412 | 275 | 414,284 | 62.10% | 50.16% |
| Boards 28, 43, and 67 | 897 | 780 | 686 | 88.05% | 496 | 344 | 415,913 | 67.49% | 59.43% |
| Board 31 (Hamilton) | 1,595 | 1,321 | 1,041 | 78.64% | 716 | 500 | 663,396 | 66.98% | 52.68% |
| Board 48 (Lucas) | 670 | 590 | 502 | 85.08% | 342 | 254 | 363,436 | 66.86% | 56.88% |
| Boards 50 and 76 | 1,163 | 1,029 | 894 | 86.84% | 604 | 433 | 517,995 | 70.08% | 60.86% |
| Board 57 (Montgomery) | 996 | 839 | 639 | 76.43% | 410 | 313 | 456,829 | 74.09% | 56.63% |
| Board 77 (Summit) | 833 | 735 | 584 | 79.63% | 426 | 313 | 455,218 | 68.66% | 54.67% |
| Oklahoma | 7,770 | 6,311 | 5,321 | 84.55% | 4,017 | 2,873 | 3,180,210 | 68.10% | 57.58% |
| Central | 929 | 816 | 661 | 81.31% | 560 | 395 | 406,362 | 65.73% | 53.45% |
| East Central | 795 | 633 | 563 | 89.34% | 435 | 310 | 363,907 | 69.08% | 61.72% |
| Northeast | 954 | 765 | 684 | 89.42% | 493 | 349 | 403,170 | 68.38% | 61.15% |
| Northwest and Southwest | 1,250 | 901 | 797 | 88.79% | 542 | 411 | 452,073 | 70.67% | 62.75% |
| Oklahoma County | 1,426 | 1,198 | 957 | 79.85% | 690 | 493 | 616,207 | 67.01% | 53.51% |
| Southeast | 1,085 | 853 | 727 | 85.88% | 553 | 397 | 429,603 | 69.98% | 60.10% |
| Tulsa County | 1,331 | 1,145 | 932 | 81.70% | 744 | 518 | 508,888 | 66.86% | 54.63% |
| Oregon | 8,215 | 7,167 | 5,904 | 82.57% | 4,042 | 2,958 | 3,424,658 | 71.66% | 59.17% |
| Region 1 (Multnomah) | 1,633 | 1,481 | 1,221 | 82.69% | 852 | 599 | 676,840 | 69.74% | 57.67% |
| Region 2 | 1,867 | 1,725 | 1,429 | 83.19% | 1,096 | 817 | 811,991 | 73.03% | 60.75% |
| Region 3 | 2,379 | 2,058 | 1,647 | 80.00% | 1,132 | 835 | 1,063,850 | 72.54% | 58.03% |
| Region 4 | 1,455 | 1,198 | 979 | 81.90% | 549 | 415 | 483,699 | 71.40% | 58.47% |
| Region 5 (Central) | 299 | 265 | 236 | 89.31% | 155 | 103 | 178,587 | 70.50% | 62.97% |
| Region 6 (Eastern) | 582 | 440 | 392 | 89.38% | 258 | 189 | 209,690 | 69.97% | 62.54% |
| Pennsylvania | 22,355 | 18,950 | 15,206 | 80.16% | 9,726 | 7,122 | 10,839,410 | 71.00% | 56.92% |
| Region 1 (Allegheny) | 2,263 | 1,993 | 1,555 | 78.17% | 907 | 611 | 1,059,578 | 67.40% | 52.68% |
| Regions 3, 8, 9, and 51 | 1,470 | 1,250 | 1,035 | 82.91% | 638 | 475 | 597,776 | 72.05% | 59.74% |
| Regions 4, 11, 37, and 49 | 1,652 | 1,247 | 1,017 | 81.69% | 621 | 437 | 767,695 | 70.32% | 57.44% |
| Regions 5, 18, 23, 24, and 46 | 1,400 | 1,217 | 1,019 | 83.60% | 650 | 497 | 633,833 | 73.21% | 61.20% |
| Regions 6, 12, 16, 31, 35, 45, and 47 | 1,051 | 854 | 698 | 81.83% | 500 | 383 | 608,238 | 72.53% | 59.35% |
| Regions 7, 13, 20, and 33 | 4,176 | 3,801 | 2,845 | 73.95% | 1,908 | 1,356 | 2,117,660 | 68.44% | 50.61% |
| Regions 10, 15, 27, 32, 43, and 44 | 908 | 665 | 588 | 88.57% | 359 | 279 | 436,103 | 73.91% | 65.46% |
| Regions 17 and 21 | 674 | 518 | 449 | 86.64% | 287 | 213 | 311,440 | 74.36% | 64.42% |
| Regions 19, 26, 28, and 42 | 2,341 | 2,121 | 1,848 | 87.12% | 1,186 | 887 | 1,233,033 | 72.54% | 63.20% |
| Regions 22, 38, 40, 41, and 48 | 1,458 | 1,237 | 1,044 | 84.39% | 618 | 445 | 708,013 | 69.50% | 58.66% |
| Regions 29 and 34 | 1,117 | 918 | 793 | 86.85% | 461 | 316 | 558,238 | 66.20% | 57.49% |
| Regions 30 and 50 | 1,127 | 946 | 791 | 83.87% | 510 | 392 | 518,639 | 76.89% | 64.49% |
| Region 36 (Philadelphia) | 2,718 | 2,183 | 1,524 | 69.95% | 1,081 | 831 | 1,289,164 | 74.37% | 52.02% |
| Rhode Island | 8,654 | 7,365 | 5,817 | 79.21% | 4,044 | 2,892 | 903,919 | 69.62% | 55.14% |
| Region 1: Southern Providence County | 1,353 | 1,242 | 950 | 76.88% | 672 | 442 | 165,030 | 66.75% | 51.32% |
| Region 2: Northern Providence County/ Blackstone Valley |
1,913 | 1,708 | 1,407 | 82.38% | 1,010 | 737 | 181,461 | 69.45% | 57.22% |
| Region 3: Providence | 1,236 | 985 | 718 | 73.32% | 608 | 470 | 150,431 | 75.50% | 55.35% |
| Region 4: Kent County | 1,248 | 1,136 | 908 | 80.50% | 592 | 432 | 147,798 | 71.13% | 57.26% |
| Region 5: East Bay | 809 | 727 | 568 | 78.42% | 390 | 287 | 83,752 | 70.49% | 55.28% |
| Region 6: Newport County | 843 | 648 | 525 | 81.07% | 326 | 202 | 71,293 | 63.81% | 51.73% |
| Region 7: South County | 1,252 | 919 | 741 | 80.77% | 446 | 322 | 104,153 | 69.89% | 56.45% |
| South Carolina | 8,619 | 6,994 | 5,847 | 83.46% | 3,938 | 2,955 | 4,071,052 | 73.37% | 61.24% |
| Region 1 | 2,608 | 2,133 | 1,756 | 82.11% | 1,155 | 849 | 1,274,110 | 70.05% | 57.52% |
| Region 2 | 2,108 | 1,768 | 1,480 | 83.57% | 1,089 | 796 | 1,001,686 | 71.17% | 59.48% |
| Region 3 | 1,571 | 1,279 | 1,105 | 86.33% | 714 | 536 | 705,283 | 74.78% | 64.56% |
| Region 4 | 2,332 | 1,814 | 1,506 | 82.99% | 980 | 774 | 1,089,973 | 78.16% | 64.86% |
| South Dakota | 7,330 | 6,085 | 5,515 | 90.96% | 3,812 | 2,845 | 698,307 | 73.62% | 66.97% |
| Region 1 | 1,750 | 1,476 | 1,338 | 90.89% | 901 | 687 | 172,217 | 74.65% | 67.85% |
| Region 2 | 661 | 552 | 499 | 90.69% | 332 | 254 | 64,285 | 77.26% | 70.07% |
| Region 3 | 1,844 | 1,429 | 1,322 | 92.80% | 886 | 661 | 164,858 | 74.42% | 69.07% |
| Region 4 | 1,087 | 897 | 812 | 90.98% | 545 | 409 | 98,178 | 71.61% | 65.16% |
| Region 5 | 1,988 | 1,731 | 1,544 | 89.57% | 1,148 | 834 | 198,769 | 71.98% | 64.47% |
| Tennessee | 8,030 | 6,527 | 5,524 | 84.75% | 3,929 | 2,943 | 5,508,015 | 72.95% | 61.82% |
| Region 1 | 685 | 584 | 500 | 85.10% | 364 | 272 | 445,617 | 70.25% | 59.78% |
| Region 2 | 1,461 | 1,167 | 997 | 85.50% | 649 | 503 | 1,031,340 | 77.28% | 66.08% |
| Region 3 | 1,352 | 1,054 | 941 | 89.39% | 642 | 488 | 825,704 | 76.10% | 68.03% |
| Region 4 (Davidson) | 790 | 684 | 507 | 74.74% | 382 | 260 | 545,915 | 66.00% | 49.32% |
| Region 5 | 1,704 | 1,475 | 1,247 | 84.81% | 943 | 681 | 1,340,254 | 73.03% | 61.93% |
| Region 6 | 905 | 658 | 607 | 92.26% | 381 | 285 | 535,742 | 66.41% | 61.27% |
| Region 7 (Shelby) | 1,133 | 905 | 725 | 80.36% | 568 | 454 | 783,443 | 75.29% | 60.50% |
| Texas | 20,024 | 16,766 | 14,481 | 86.18% | 13,194 | 9,984 | 22,110,904 | 72.80% | 62.73% |
| Region 1 | 717 | 597 | 505 | 84.48% | 412 | 296 | 720,872 | 70.41% | 59.48% |
| Region 2 | 609 | 478 | 439 | 92.00% | 325 | 254 | 464,435 | 76.34% | 70.23% |
| Region 3 | 5,079 | 4,532 | 4,069 | 89.79% | 3,823 | 3,002 | 5,965,536 | 76.39% | 68.59% |
| Region 3a | 3,184 | 2,876 | 2,522 | 87.71% | 2,430 | 1,835 | 3,811,325 | 72.96% | 64.00% |
| Region 3bc | 1,895 | 1,656 | 1,547 | 93.46% | 1,393 | 1,167 | 2,154,212 | 82.46% | 77.07% |
| Region 4 | 1,171 | 806 | 736 | 91.15% | 580 | 486 | 960,048 | 81.68% | 74.45% |
| Region 5 | 666 | 471 | 447 | 95.18% | 326 | 265 | 661,439 | 78.95% | 75.14% |
| Region 6 | 4,665 | 3,960 | 3,194 | 80.59% | 3,051 | 2,116 | 5,368,072 | 65.03% | 52.41% |
| Region 6a | 4,157 | 3,604 | 2,881 | 79.84% | 2,750 | 1,906 | 4,805,141 | 65.08% | 51.96% |
| Region 6bc | 508 | 356 | 313 | 87.61% | 301 | 210 | 562,931 | 64.54% | 56.54% |
| Region 7 | 2,537 | 2,146 | 1,848 | 86.23% | 1,651 | 1,221 | 2,685,359 | 71.80% | 61.91% |
| Region 7a | 1,552 | 1,335 | 1,148 | 86.23% | 1,007 | 715 | 1,714,533 | 69.64% | 60.05% |
| Region 7bcd | 985 | 811 | 700 | 86.23% | 644 | 506 | 970,827 | 75.53% | 65.13% |
| Region 8 | 2,134 | 1,737 | 1,455 | 83.88% | 1,310 | 1,016 | 2,305,620 | 75.07% | 62.97% |
| Region 9 | 451 | 365 | 327 | 89.26% | 291 | 189 | 494,537 | 61.94% | 55.28% |
| Region 10 | 511 | 451 | 399 | 88.52% | 380 | 294 | 718,969 | 75.50% | 66.83% |
| Region 11 | 1,484 | 1,223 | 1,062 | 84.23% | 1,045 | 845 | 1,766,017 | 76.63% | 64.55% |
| Region 11abd | 898 | 808 | 707 | 87.65% | 679 | 535 | 1,113,103 | 74.45% | 65.25% |
| Region 11c (Hidalgo) | 586 | 415 | 355 | 79.20% | 366 | 310 | 652,914 | 80.24% | 63.54% |
| Utah | 4,523 | 3,991 | 3,589 | 89.98% | 3,605 | 2,876 | 2,359,519 | 77.60% | 69.82% |
| Bear River, Northeastern, Summit, Tooele, and Wasatch |
400 | 346 | 322 | 93.13% | 311 | 251 | 284,421 | 79.58% | 74.11% |
| Central, Four Corners, San Juan, and Southwest |
660 | 478 | 424 | 88.56% | 380 | 282 | 285,613 | 72.46% | 64.18% |
| Central, Four Corners, and San Juan | 306 | 204 | 184 | 89.83% | 160 | 116 | 109,353 | 73.52% | 66.05% |
| Southwest | 354 | 274 | 240 | 87.66% | 220 | 166 | 176,260 | 71.62% | 62.79% |
| Davis County | 415 | 389 | 338 | 86.36% | 323 | 252 | 255,266 | 76.18% | 65.79% |
| Salt Lake County | 1,869 | 1,716 | 1,529 | 89.28% | 1,575 | 1,279 | 895,778 | 79.06% | 70.58% |
| Utah County | 748 | 682 | 621 | 91.15% | 656 | 518 | 434,211 | 76.49% | 69.72% |
| Weber, Morgan | 431 | 380 | 355 | 93.72% | 360 | 294 | 204,230 | 78.41% | 73.49% |
| Vermont | 10,948 | 8,693 | 7,070 | 81.26% | 3,913 | 2,804 | 545,119 | 71.25% | 57.90% |
| Champlain Valley | 3,984 | 3,489 | 2,824 | 80.89% | 1,743 | 1,237 | 219,413 | 69.19% | 55.97% |
| Rural Northeast | 2,453 | 1,869 | 1,389 | 74.09% | 768 | 552 | 128,344 | 72.28% | 53.55% |
| Rural Southeast | 2,593 | 1,930 | 1,639 | 84.98% | 806 | 583 | 112,629 | 73.11% | 62.13% |
| Rural Southwest | 1,918 | 1,405 | 1,218 | 86.81% | 596 | 432 | 84,734 | 73.18% | 63.53% |
| Virginia | 11,525 | 10,047 | 8,175 | 81.46% | 6,210 | 4,558 | 6,920,132 | 70.57% | 57.49% |
| Region 1 | 1,573 | 1,365 | 1,167 | 85.39% | 858 | 666 | 1,075,646 | 74.06% | 63.24% |
| Region 2 | 3,000 | 2,753 | 2,151 | 78.36% | 1,859 | 1,285 | 1,969,310 | 65.75% | 51.52% |
| Region 3 | 2,221 | 1,817 | 1,573 | 86.48% | 1,035 | 793 | 1,159,100 | 74.24% | 64.21% |
| Region 4 | 1,948 | 1,725 | 1,389 | 80.54% | 1,056 | 774 | 1,178,568 | 71.25% | 57.39% |
| Region 5 | 2,783 | 2,387 | 1,895 | 79.51% | 1,402 | 1,040 | 1,537,508 | 71.21% | 56.62% |
| Washington | 7,920 | 7,017 | 5,483 | 78.16% | 3,909 | 2,813 | 5,983,711 | 70.11% | 54.79% |
| Region 1 | 1,587 | 1,320 | 1,108 | 83.99% | 881 | 639 | 1,297,892 | 70.82% | 59.48% |
| Greater Columbia and North Central | 972 | 809 | 676 | 83.66% | 580 | 417 | 772,866 | 69.21% | 57.90% |
| Spokane | 615 | 511 | 432 | 84.53% | 301 | 222 | 525,025 | 73.58% | 62.19% |
| Region 2 | 3,778 | 3,425 | 2,571 | 74.98% | 1,794 | 1,243 | 2,757,283 | 67.05% | 50.28% |
| King | 2,524 | 2,310 | 1,658 | 71.54% | 1,175 | 806 | 1,761,061 | 66.40% | 47.50% |
| North Sound | 1,254 | 1,115 | 913 | 82.24% | 619 | 437 | 996,223 | 68.34% | 56.21% |
| Region 3 | 2,555 | 2,272 | 1,804 | 79.59% | 1,234 | 931 | 1,928,536 | 74.43% | 59.24% |
| Pierce | 1,255 | 1,130 | 875 | 77.61% | 619 | 485 | 704,398 | 78.28% | 60.76% |
| Salish | 381 | 334 | 278 | 82.82% | 175 | 121 | 320,556 | 68.65% | 56.86% |
| SW WA and Great Rivers | 628 | 572 | 450 | 79.14% | 317 | 239 | 621,859 | 73.54% | 58.20% |
| Thurston-Mason | 291 | 236 | 201 | 85.41% | 123 | 86 | 281,722 | 66.98% | 57.21% |
| West Virginia | 9,626 | 7,859 | 6,526 | 83.15% | 4,122 | 2,842 | 1,572,220 | 66.11% | 54.97% |
| Region I | 679 | 596 | 500 | 84.07% | 285 | 190 | 124,260 | 62.73% | 52.74% |
| Region II | 1,188 | 1,026 | 867 | 84.54% | 584 | 434 | 223,897 | 73.35% | 62.01% |
| Region III | 895 | 712 | 614 | 86.38% | 376 | 261 | 144,615 | 64.86% | 56.02% |
| Region IV | 2,075 | 1,744 | 1,441 | 82.54% | 995 | 657 | 347,400 | 65.47% | 54.04% |
| Region V | 2,672 | 2,127 | 1,759 | 82.81% | 1,062 | 693 | 445,709 | 61.18% | 50.67% |
| Region VI | 2,117 | 1,654 | 1,345 | 81.62% | 820 | 607 | 286,339 | 70.09% | 57.21% |
| Wisconsin | 9,625 | 7,918 | 6,614 | 83.55% | 4,065 | 2,924 | 4,850,551 | 70.47% | 58.88% |
| Milwaukee | 1,610 | 1,462 | 1,153 | 78.70% | 705 | 490 | 783,239 | 67.91% | 53.44% |
| Northeastern | 1,876 | 1,677 | 1,386 | 82.42% | 779 | 573 | 1,052,103 | 74.47% | 61.38% |
| Northern | 1,316 | 719 | 616 | 85.90% | 326 | 256 | 417,435 | 78.72% | 67.62% |
| Southeastern | 1,837 | 1,645 | 1,350 | 82.27% | 921 | 626 | 985,969 | 66.92% | 55.06% |
| Southern | 1,925 | 1,606 | 1,393 | 86.47% | 874 | 640 | 949,286 | 68.58% | 59.30% |
| Western | 1,061 | 809 | 716 | 88.64% | 460 | 339 | 662,520 | 71.40% | 63.29% |
| Wyoming | 8,243 | 6,401 | 5,544 | 86.57% | 3,822 | 2,890 | 481,640 | 73.85% | 63.93% |
| Judicial District 1 (Laramie) | 1,383 | 1,160 | 972 | 83.75% | 631 | 460 | 79,139 | 69.94% | 58.58% |
| Judicial District 2 | 853 | 633 | 545 | 85.74% | 433 | 347 | 46,291 | 79.51% | 68.18% |
| Judicial District 3 | 1,167 | 818 | 733 | 89.09% | 530 | 412 | 67,465 | 77.26% | 68.83% |
| Judicial District 4 | 456 | 349 | 300 | 85.97% | 190 | 134 | 32,153 | 67.00% | 57.60% |
| Judicial District 5 | 864 | 679 | 574 | 84.64% | 333 | 259 | 46,042 | 80.30% | 67.96% |
| Judicial District 6 | 918 | 719 | 623 | 87.04% | 441 | 350 | 50,169 | 78.56% | 68.38% |
| Judicial District 7 (Natrona) | 1,014 | 879 | 756 | 86.35% | 541 | 430 | 65,305 | 78.62% | 67.89% |
| Judicial District 8 | 632 | 484 | 432 | 89.22% | 293 | 195 | 33,622 | 63.32% | 56.50% |
| Judicial District 9 | 956 | 680 | 609 | 89.25% | 430 | 303 | 61,452 | 67.29% | 60.06% |
| DU = dwelling unit; SPA = service planning area. NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2014-2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at https://www.samhsa.gov/data. NOTE: To compute the pooled 2014-2016 weighted response rates, the three samples were combined, and the individual-year weights were used for the pooled sample. Thus, the response rates presented here are weighted across 3 years of data rather than being a simple average of the 2014, 2015, and 2016 individual response rates. NOTE: The total responded column represents the combined sample size from the 2014, 2015, and 2016 NSDUHs. NOTE: The population estimate is the simple average of the 2014, 2015, and 2016 population counts for individuals aged 12 or older. Because of rounding, the sum of the substate region population counts within a state may not exactly match the state population count listed in the table. Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2014, 2015, and 2016. |
|||||||||
| State/Substate Region | 12–20 Total Selected |
12–20 Total Responded |
12–20 Population Estimate |
12–20 Weighted Interview Response Rate (Percentage) |
18+ Total Selected |
18+ Total Responded |
18+ Population Estimate |
18+ Weighted Interview Response Rate (Percentage) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total United States | 88,841 | 69,151 | 37,874,213 | 78.03% | 216,172 | 152,806 | 242,602,294 | 68.74% |
| Northeast | 17,552 | 13,182 | 6,446,688 | 74.02% | 43,015 | 29,039 | 43,627,889 | 65.16% |
| Midwest | 21,201 | 16,233 | 8,084,417 | 76.11% | 50,884 | 35,759 | 51,280,094 | 68.46% |
| South | 29,207 | 23,163 | 14,215,451 | 79.70% | 70,878 | 51,166 | 90,640,312 | 70.44% |
| West | 20,881 | 16,573 | 9,127,658 | 79.93% | 51,395 | 36,842 | 57,053,999 | 69.03% |
| Alabama | 1,222 | 964 | 583,463 | 80.07% | 3,117 | 2,206 | 3,687,329 | 67.70% |
| Region 1 | 363 | 277 | 159,857 | 76.89% | 899 | 635 | 1,035,597 | 67.25% |
| Region 2 | 364 | 275 | 187,245 | 75.93% | 990 | 657 | 1,180,600 | 63.17% |
| Region 3 | 246 | 204 | 110,798 | 87.01% | 565 | 417 | 660,982 | 71.82% |
| Region 4 | 249 | 208 | 125,563 | 83.91% | 663 | 497 | 810,150 | 72.08% |
| Alaska | 1,351 | 985 | 90,578 | 72.89% | 3,080 | 2,172 | 524,044 | 69.33% |
| Anchorage | 551 | 422 | 36,804 | 75.30% | 1,349 | 975 | 215,449 | 70.10% |
| Northern | 292 | 208 | 21,871 | 69.89% | 642 | 441 | 115,457 | 67.40% |
| South Central | 382 | 277 | 23,681 | 74.46% | 783 | 551 | 137,679 | 70.52% |
| Southeast | 126 | 78 | 8,222 | 63.31% | 306 | 205 | 55,458 | 66.73% |
| Arizona | 1,176 | 929 | 792,006 | 79.61% | 3,063 | 2,246 | 5,097,411 | 72.70% |
| Central | 723 | 574 | 483,793 | 79.84% | 1,970 | 1,435 | 3,031,603 | 71.82% |
| North | 117 | 84 | 89,562 | 72.73% | 305 | 219 | 621,983 | 72.00% |
| South | 336 | 271 | 218,652 | 81.54% | 788 | 592 | 1,443,826 | 75.14% |
| South A | 170 | 138 | 114,084 | 82.50% | 473 | 359 | 795,469 | 76.32% |
| South B | 166 | 133 | 104,567 | 80.63% | 315 | 233 | 648,357 | 73.39% |
| Arkansas | 1,254 | 990 | 345,621 | 78.49% | 3,048 | 2,197 | 2,222,652 | 69.59% |
| Catchment Area 1 | 193 | 158 | 63,385 | 81.56% | 516 | 348 | 362,320 | 66.60% |
| Catchment Area 2 | 133 | 111 | 36,724 | 83.18% | 405 | 304 | 272,510 | 74.16% |
| Catchment Area 3 | 187 | 146 | 47,299 | 78.80% | 431 | 326 | 293,789 | 75.45% |
| Catchment Area 4 | 143 | 116 | 31,108 | 83.17% | 307 | 222 | 194,739 | 69.35% |
| Catchment Area 5 | 201 | 154 | 52,306 | 74.81% | 485 | 342 | 334,562 | 65.76% |
| Catchment Area 6 | 108 | 90 | 23,726 | 81.57% | 233 | 180 | 156,218 | 72.88% |
| Catchment Area 7 | 76 | 66 | 26,194 | 87.45% | 171 | 130 | 170,946 | 74.41% |
| Catchment Area 8 | 213 | 149 | 64,878 | 69.34% | 500 | 345 | 437,568 | 64.87% |
| California | 5,967 | 4,775 | 4,784,400 | 79.99% | 15,275 | 10,504 | 29,434,856 | 66.70% |
| Region 1R | 180 | 136 | 107,076 | 76.15% | 395 | 302 | 750,574 | 74.93% |
| Region 2R | 184 | 154 | 127,834 | 83.69% | 415 | 307 | 796,588 | 71.53% |
| Region 3R (Sacramento) | 215 | 176 | 178,714 | 80.39% | 623 | 460 | 1,111,600 | 71.28% |
| Region 4R | 200 | 158 | 148,314 | 78.36% | 531 | 360 | 1,029,401 | 66.96% |
| Region 5R (San Francisco) | 51 | 38 | 57,099 | 68.06% | 340 | 200 | 731,968 | 56.12% |
| Region 6 (Santa Clara) | 292 | 230 | 212,871 | 79.69% | 844 | 589 | 1,436,324 | 67.42% |
| Region 7R (Contra Costa) | 182 | 147 | 132,712 | 80.94% | 485 | 350 | 841,324 | 70.70% |
| Region 8R (Alameda) | 192 | 152 | 176,169 | 79.00% | 608 | 435 | 1,233,116 | 70.51% |
| Region 9R (San Mateo) | 89 | 72 | 76,639 | 81.86% | 303 | 205 | 583,830 | 67.61% |
| Region 10 | 179 | 129 | 167,426 | 70.32% | 428 | 280 | 977,787 | 64.17% |
| Region 11 (Los Angeles) | 1,557 | 1,227 | 1,227,942 | 78.95% | 4,015 | 2,580 | 7,724,963 | 61.64% |
| LA SPA 1 and 5 | 138 | 112 | 124,934 | 82.35% | 353 | 241 | 843,590 | 65.43% |
| LA SPA 2 | 382 | 292 | 253,028 | 75.69% | 905 | 542 | 1,706,615 | 58.38% |
| LA SPA 3 | 236 | 175 | 216,070 | 74.04% | 625 | 420 | 1,378,551 | 63.99% |
| LA SPA 4 | 99 | 82 | 111,247 | 83.44% | 430 | 237 | 925,724 | 51.90% |
| LA SPA 6 | 197 | 162 | 156,949 | 82.92% | 457 | 324 | 720,942 | 69.59% |
| LA SPA 7 | 231 | 173 | 180,454 | 75.58% | 539 | 345 | 961,561 | 62.09% |
| LA SPA 8 | 274 | 231 | 185,260 | 84.61% | 706 | 471 | 1,187,980 | 62.33% |
| Region 12R | 143 | 120 | 115,900 | 85.79% | 306 | 224 | 640,601 | 68.66% |
| Regions 13 and 19R | 435 | 361 | 354,924 | 83.42% | 956 | 703 | 1,837,605 | 71.41% |
| Region 14 (Orange) | 446 | 343 | 383,565 | 76.57% | 1,105 | 680 | 2,430,400 | 58.81% |
| Region 15R (Fresno) | 160 | 126 | 138,530 | 76.44% | 392 | 277 | 693,102 | 68.70% |
| Region 16R (San Diego) | 452 | 383 | 386,786 | 84.96% | 1,208 | 836 | 2,508,452 | 68.74% |
| Region 17R | 325 | 277 | 214,799 | 83.14% | 759 | 582 | 1,068,543 | 73.88% |
| Region 18R (San Bernardino) | 385 | 303 | 307,658 | 80.74% | 843 | 603 | 1,537,109 | 69.50% |
| Region 20R | 162 | 131 | 136,808 | 83.31% | 368 | 279 | 699,336 | 74.90% |
| Region 21R | 138 | 112 | 132,631 | 78.49% | 351 | 252 | 802,232 | 69.94% |
| Colorado | 1,303 | 1,042 | 650,188 | 79.85% | 3,060 | 2,154 | 4,107,426 | 69.62% |
| Region 1 | 167 | 118 | 102,188 | 70.29% | 508 | 353 | 688,644 | 70.63% |
| Region 2 | 95 | 82 | 56,080 | 87.02% | 221 | 147 | 314,026 | 59.43% |
| Region 3 | 398 | 332 | 181,725 | 84.07% | 853 | 594 | 1,051,515 | 67.86% |
| Region 4 | 90 | 71 | 42,196 | 73.42% | 179 | 142 | 281,980 | 78.05% |
| Region 5 | 173 | 142 | 69,054 | 80.55% | 406 | 290 | 525,296 | 72.62% |
| Region 6 | 213 | 169 | 104,856 | 78.36% | 522 | 361 | 704,640 | 69.26% |
| Region 7 | 167 | 128 | 94,088 | 78.22% | 371 | 267 | 541,324 | 71.88% |
| Connecticut | 1,308 | 999 | 440,718 | 77.32% | 3,298 | 2,160 | 2,773,834 | 64.11% |
| Eastern | 149 | 121 | 59,284 | 83.78% | 423 | 293 | 340,079 | 66.69% |
| North Central | 333 | 259 | 118,873 | 77.95% | 923 | 617 | 776,864 | 65.53% |
| Northwestern | 243 | 178 | 74,892 | 74.40% | 589 | 395 | 475,800 | 69.51% |
| South Central | 319 | 240 | 99,699 | 77.15% | 784 | 509 | 652,746 | 62.21% |
| Southwest | 264 | 201 | 87,971 | 75.68% | 579 | 346 | 528,345 | 57.41% |
| Delaware | 1,274 | 986 | 107,615 | 77.92% | 2,997 | 2,105 | 725,071 | 70.07% |
| Kent | 257 | 200 | 21,087 | 79.12% | 567 | 409 | 130,096 | 69.90% |
| New Castle (excluding Wilmington City) | 718 | 552 | 58,594 | 77.12% | 1,668 | 1,147 | 370,720 | 69.70% |
| Sussex | 215 | 161 | 19,735 | 74.64% | 579 | 403 | 166,287 | 69.11% |
| Wilmington City | 84 | 73 | 8,199 | 87.93% | 183 | 146 | 57,967 | 78.21% |
| District of Columbia | 1,037 | 862 | 55,389 | 83.78% | 2,881 | 2,143 | 542,377 | 73.29% |
| Ward 1 | 68 | 59 | 6,159 | 93.60% | 368 | 266 | 69,188 | 67.86% |
| Ward 2 | 96 | 84 | 6,166 | 85.27% | 368 | 260 | 75,103 | 69.74% |
| Ward 3 | 96 | 74 | 5,779 | 74.66% | 327 | 226 | 70,331 | 72.23% |
| Ward 4 | 150 | 120 | 6,323 | 80.12% | 400 | 291 | 66,071 | 73.08% |
| Ward 5 | 141 | 114 | 7,253 | 80.79% | 308 | 236 | 68,569 | 74.33% |
| Ward 6 | 98 | 88 | 4,442 | 85.33% | 479 | 372 | 71,791 | 75.88% |
| Ward 7 | 173 | 148 | 8,934 | 87.48% | 316 | 249 | 61,385 | 77.52% |
| Ward 8 | 215 | 175 | 10,332 | 82.72% | 315 | 243 | 59,938 | 75.17% |
| Florida | 4,326 | 3,455 | 2,112,061 | 80.15% | 10,605 | 7,580 | 15,841,372 | 68.63% |
| Broward (Circuit 17) | 307 | 254 | 197,862 | 83.19% | 825 | 583 | 1,457,063 | 69.54% |
| Central I | 717 | 575 | 293,723 | 80.61% | 1,631 | 1,192 | 1,984,893 | 71.46% |
| Circuit 9 | 465 | 384 | 186,420 | 82.45% | 1,055 | 785 | 1,178,609 | 72.96% |
| Circuit 18 | 252 | 191 | 107,303 | 77.27% | 576 | 407 | 806,284 | 69.59% |
| Central II | 1,142 | 884 | 561,947 | 77.46% | 2,902 | 2,094 | 4,448,834 | 68.88% |
| Circuit 6 | 307 | 220 | 134,463 | 73.69% | 755 | 510 | 1,173,449 | 64.76% |
| Circuit 10 | 224 | 183 | 84,823 | 82.41% | 475 | 385 | 592,906 | 79.41% |
| Circuit 12 | 126 | 93 | 70,017 | 71.88% | 331 | 247 | 643,096 | 75.82% |
| Circuit 13 (Hillsborough) | 328 | 266 | 157,368 | 81.22% | 872 | 621 | 1,034,066 | 66.97% |
| Circuit 20 | 157 | 122 | 115,277 | 74.68% | 469 | 331 | 1,005,318 | 64.75% |
| Northeast | 728 | 551 | 391,607 | 76.42% | 1,757 | 1,191 | 2,965,173 | 65.11% |
| Circuit 4 | 248 | 188 | 133,307 | 74.83% | 574 | 383 | 903,630 | 63.80% |
| Circuit 5 | 198 | 136 | 98,470 | 70.27% | 502 | 345 | 897,402 | 68.46% |
| Circuit 7 | 169 | 141 | 94,000 | 84.81% | 453 | 289 | 726,193 | 58.86% |
| Circuit 8 plus Columbia, Dixie, Hamilton, Lafayette, and Suwannee |
113 | 86 | 65,830 | 77.90% | 228 | 174 | 437,948 | 72.19% |
| Northwest | 393 | 326 | 171,408 | 84.85% | 969 | 743 | 1,172,641 | 73.49% |
| Circuit 1 | 197 | 161 | 82,970 | 82.64% | 477 | 354 | 571,015 | 70.21% |
| Circuit 2 plus Madison and Taylor | 141 | 121 | 57,271 | 88.00% | 349 | 278 | 360,226 | 76.61% |
| Circuit 14 | 55 | 44 | 31,167 | 83.74% | 143 | 111 | 241,400 | 76.87% |
| South (Circuits 11 and 16) | 614 | 511 | 292,977 | 83.47% | 1,444 | 1,041 | 2,186,453 | 69.51% |
| Southeast | 425 | 354 | 202,537 | 82.14% | 1,077 | 736 | 1,626,314 | 64.80% |
| Circuit 15 (Palm Beach) | 280 | 234 | 139,028 | 82.37% | 739 | 487 | 1,118,123 | 62.19% |
| Circuit 19 | 145 | 120 | 63,509 | 81.65% | 338 | 249 | 508,191 | 70.23% |
| Georgia | 1,899 | 1,530 | 1,232,724 | 80.30% | 4,571 | 3,398 | 7,503,516 | 71.61% |
| Region 1 | 505 | 397 | 321,545 | 79.61% | 1,158 | 816 | 1,924,757 | 68.16% |
| Region 2 | 282 | 228 | 159,654 | 79.51% | 668 | 510 | 966,011 | 72.68% |
| Region 3 | 574 | 453 | 357,533 | 78.61% | 1,427 | 1,049 | 2,244,757 | 70.33% |
| Region 4 | 113 | 99 | 77,785 | 86.13% | 252 | 210 | 464,512 | 83.71% |
| Region 5 | 199 | 169 | 139,210 | 85.63% | 482 | 375 | 859,320 | 75.78% |
| Region 6 | 226 | 184 | 176,996 | 80.42% | 584 | 438 | 1,044,159 | 72.42% |
| Hawaii | 1,322 | 1,013 | 148,317 | 77.00% | 3,200 | 2,235 | 1,064,978 | 68.94% |
| Hawaii Island | 221 | 170 | 20,261 | 76.83% | 474 | 349 | 141,904 | 72.78% |
| Honolulu | 854 | 665 | 104,456 | 78.44% | 2,112 | 1,468 | 751,659 | 68.04% |
| Kauai | 105 | 75 | 6,993 | 74.47% | 239 | 171 | 51,617 | 73.47% |
| Maui | 142 | 103 | 16,607 | 69.14% | 375 | 247 | 119,797 | 67.21% |
| Idaho | 1,251 | 998 | 215,761 | 80.10% | 3,082 | 2,301 | 1,205,453 | 73.27% |
| Region 1 | 132 | 88 | 26,535 | 72.29% | 375 | 244 | 171,286 | 62.93% |
| Region 2 | 66 | 51 | 14,042 | 75.39% | 199 | 154 | 87,499 | 77.49% |
| Region 3 | 247 | 201 | 36,934 | 82.39% | 551 | 422 | 188,302 | 75.13% |
| Region 4 | 325 | 269 | 58,998 | 82.75% | 892 | 673 | 348,081 | 74.92% |
| Region 5 | 175 | 143 | 25,199 | 76.66% | 399 | 313 | 137,821 | 77.65% |
| Region 6 | 92 | 72 | 16,742 | 80.08% | 189 | 128 | 89,142 | 67.01% |
| Region 7 | 214 | 174 | 37,311 | 82.42% | 477 | 367 | 183,322 | 74.00% |
| Illinois | 3,405 | 2,495 | 1,551,146 | 73.53% | 8,349 | 5,382 | 9,706,617 | 63.14% |
| Region 1 (Cook) | 1,163 | 832 | 591,721 | 72.80% | 3,093 | 1,929 | 3,980,259 | 61.36% |
| Region 1.1 (Far North Side) | 56 | 30 | 44,374 | 49.35% | 245 | 147 | 372,698 | 62.28% |
| Region 1.2 (Northwest Side) | 76 | 49 | 32,313 | 66.42% | 215 | 119 | 205,023 | 55.03% |
| Region 1.3 (North Central Side) | 42 | 26 | 29,875 | 64.55% | 200 | 113 | 385,950 | 57.72% |
| Region 1.4 (West Side) | 86 | 67 | 55,939 | 76.40% | 255 | 174 | 357,461 | 64.75% |
| Region 1.5 (South Side) | 136 | 98 | 79,398 | 74.26% | 273 | 180 | 500,953 | 69.51% |
| Region 1.6 (Southwest Side) | 146 | 105 | 54,572 | 72.39% | 331 | 199 | 266,658 | 58.31% |
| Region 1.7 (Suburban Cook) | 621 | 457 | 295,251 | 75.43% | 1,574 | 997 | 1,891,516 | 60.99% |
| Region 2 | 1,245 | 914 | 538,068 | 72.83% | 2,748 | 1,748 | 3,024,899 | 62.64% |
| Region 2a (DuPage) | 260 | 188 | 113,613 | 71.18% | 628 | 370 | 703,190 | 57.87% |
| Region 2b | 739 | 537 | 304,544 | 72.96% | 1,502 | 974 | 1,609,372 | 63.40% |
| Region 2c (Winnebago) | 65 | 51 | 34,195 | 78.56% | 182 | 123 | 215,957 | 72.43% |
| Region 2d | 181 | 138 | 85,716 | 73.08% | 436 | 281 | 496,380 | 63.66% |
| Region 3 | 460 | 340 | 182,612 | 74.78% | 1,086 | 722 | 1,103,337 | 64.22% |
| Region 3a (Champaign) | 68 | 54 | 32,778 | 81.67% | 196 | 130 | 160,071 | 63.91% |
| Region 3b | 392 | 286 | 149,834 | 73.33% | 890 | 592 | 943,266 | 64.28% |
| Region 4 | 235 | 182 | 103,777 | 77.91% | 634 | 443 | 686,609 | 69.13% |
| Region 4a (Sangamon) | 55 | 42 | 22,724 | 79.55% | 151 | 109 | 152,156 | 72.08% |
| Region 4b | 180 | 140 | 81,053 | 77.43% | 483 | 334 | 534,453 | 68.31% |
| Region 5 | 302 | 227 | 134,967 | 75.07% | 788 | 540 | 911,513 | 66.91% |
| Region 5a | 119 | 96 | 61,492 | 77.66% | 299 | 204 | 403,887 | 68.49% |
| Region 5b | 183 | 131 | 73,475 | 73.25% | 489 | 336 | 507,626 | 66.00% |
| Indiana | 1,243 | 966 | 827,225 | 77.35% | 3,043 | 2,160 | 4,943,155 | 69.15% |
| Central | 373 | 283 | 215,549 | 75.09% | 919 | 645 | 1,303,238 | 69.76% |
| East | 92 | 69 | 69,367 | 76.05% | 254 | 184 | 418,618 | 71.66% |
| North Central | 161 | 133 | 117,127 | 79.93% | 400 | 289 | 691,621 | 71.75% |
| Northeast | 140 | 110 | 84,822 | 81.11% | 307 | 221 | 482,206 | 69.51% |
| Northwest | 154 | 120 | 91,921 | 77.86% | 347 | 236 | 557,453 | 61.01% |
| Southeast | 156 | 119 | 83,081 | 75.23% | 306 | 214 | 531,555 | 70.13% |
| Southwest | 80 | 68 | 61,626 | 87.58% | 225 | 166 | 388,847 | 70.89% |
| West | 87 | 64 | 103,732 | 71.72% | 285 | 205 | 569,618 | 67.77% |
| Iowa | 1,295 | 980 | 371,555 | 76.09% | 3,048 | 2,174 | 2,354,955 | 70.02% |
| Central | 242 | 175 | 67,913 | 70.55% | 575 | 389 | 425,237 | 66.39% |
| North Central | 125 | 97 | 43,668 | 78.01% | 347 | 249 | 262,901 | 69.78% |
| Northeast | 329 | 243 | 90,132 | 73.88% | 786 | 568 | 573,041 | 71.00% |
| Northwest | 199 | 160 | 55,823 | 85.30% | 450 | 325 | 356,506 | 68.51% |
| Southeast | 295 | 225 | 77,907 | 73.86% | 632 | 453 | 501,572 | 71.66% |
| Southwest | 105 | 80 | 36,112 | 78.90% | 258 | 190 | 235,697 | 73.82% |
| Kansas | 1,323 | 1,015 | 366,159 | 76.97% | 3,051 | 2,242 | 2,126,952 | 71.83% |
| Northeast | 671 | 503 | 183,915 | 74.83% | 1,548 | 1,138 | 1,064,841 | 71.24% |
| Northwest and North Central | 73 | 54 | 26,141 | 75.31% | 182 | 124 | 171,274 | 69.24% |
| South Central | 400 | 316 | 106,068 | 79.81% | 936 | 702 | 610,972 | 74.29% |
| Southeast | 78 | 64 | 26,245 | 81.29% | 197 | 137 | 159,519 | 64.24% |
| Southwest | 101 | 78 | 23,790 | 78.11% | 188 | 141 | 120,346 | 76.08% |
| Kentucky | 1,295 | 987 | 511,359 | 75.60% | 3,040 | 2,098 | 3,328,551 | 67.09% |
| Adanta, Cumberland River, and Lifeskills | 213 | 156 | 86,520 | 73.92% | 478 | 316 | 558,416 | 64.85% |
| Bluegrass, Comprehend, and North Key | 378 | 290 | 154,669 | 76.29% | 973 | 661 | 978,054 | 66.26% |
| Centerstone | 309 | 261 | 111,337 | 83.52% | 669 | 502 | 737,009 | 71.27% |
| Communicare and River Valley | 129 | 99 | 58,440 | 76.29% | 295 | 186 | 368,569 | 59.97% |
| Four Rivers and Pennyroyal | 112 | 76 | 46,815 | 67.33% | 292 | 207 | 313,333 | 69.48% |
| Kentucky River, Mountain, and Pathways | 154 | 105 | 53,579 | 67.99% | 333 | 226 | 373,169 | 68.66% |
| Louisiana | 1,307 | 1,048 | 575,865 | 80.24% | 2,964 | 2,160 | 3,449,120 | 71.65% |
| Regions 1 and 10 | 236 | 194 | 99,714 | 79.84% | 599 | 420 | 683,376 | 69.54% |
| Region 1 | 105 | 89 | 53,766 | 84.81% | 241 | 177 | 357,579 | 75.96% |
| Region 10 (Jefferson) | 131 | 105 | 45,947 | 76.43% | 358 | 243 | 325,798 | 66.22% |
| Regions 2 and 9 | 370 | 293 | 157,745 | 81.53% | 869 | 639 | 913,889 | 75.66% |
| Region 3 | 150 | 126 | 50,616 | 85.33% | 292 | 232 | 294,147 | 77.10% |
| Regions 4, 5, and 6 | 320 | 236 | 151,080 | 72.29% | 645 | 441 | 880,787 | 65.24% |
| Regions 7 and 8 | 231 | 199 | 116,711 | 86.17% | 559 | 428 | 676,921 | 72.93% |
| Maine | 1,306 | 984 | 143,706 | 75.11% | 3,070 | 2,210 | 1,063,424 | 71.65% |
| Aroostook/Downeast | 168 | 125 | 15,867 | 75.42% | 396 | 321 | 127,875 | 80.59% |
| Aroostook | 103 | 79 | 7,418 | 77.65% | 213 | 182 | 56,908 | 84.65% |
| Downeast | 65 | 46 | 8,449 | 72.04% | 183 | 139 | 70,966 | 75.25% |
| Central | 161 | 123 | 18,581 | 77.42% | 334 | 252 | 137,966 | 76.15% |
| Cumberland | 300 | 207 | 31,674 | 68.21% | 739 | 488 | 228,127 | 67.83% |
| Midcoast | 119 | 95 | 14,344 | 79.70% | 305 | 221 | 118,144 | 72.14% |
| Penquis | 139 | 107 | 19,991 | 78.04% | 371 | 282 | 137,992 | 75.26% |
| Western | 219 | 171 | 21,938 | 75.97% | 449 | 323 | 153,654 | 70.65% |
| York | 200 | 156 | 21,312 | 78.44% | 476 | 323 | 159,666 | 64.73% |
| Maryland | 1,220 | 957 | 685,424 | 78.16% | 3,003 | 2,198 | 4,557,206 | 70.96% |
| Anne Arundel | 126 | 101 | 62,545 | 81.61% | 277 | 203 | 429,327 | 72.71% |
| Baltimore City | 120 | 98 | 66,395 | 79.98% | 406 | 316 | 479,689 | 76.45% |
| Baltimore County | 122 | 89 | 92,243 | 71.86% | 306 | 220 | 640,187 | 69.90% |
| Montgomery | 202 | 166 | 111,181 | 83.99% | 543 | 401 | 777,360 | 72.83% |
| North Central | 116 | 91 | 58,631 | 78.23% | 263 | 188 | 359,790 | 67.92% |
| Northeast | 105 | 72 | 58,037 | 68.22% | 244 | 168 | 379,811 | 67.00% |
| Prince George's | 180 | 138 | 106,281 | 74.36% | 444 | 310 | 670,647 | 66.72% |
| South | 121 | 101 | 71,086 | 84.33% | 263 | 198 | 435,659 | 73.61% |
| West | 128 | 101 | 59,026 | 80.06% | 257 | 194 | 384,736 | 69.71% |
| Massachusetts | 1,472 | 1,031 | 853,712 | 70.14% | 3,582 | 2,212 | 5,326,206 | 61.37% |
| Boston | 149 | 106 | 107,248 | 67.47% | 449 | 268 | 685,461 | 58.75% |
| Central | 198 | 132 | 116,835 | 66.83% | 483 | 300 | 679,570 | 62.18% |
| Metrowest | 315 | 214 | 190,911 | 66.01% | 793 | 476 | 1,235,420 | 60.11% |
| Northeast | 332 | 242 | 164,499 | 73.40% | 835 | 516 | 1,042,578 | 61.07% |
| Southeast | 256 | 177 | 153,576 | 70.41% | 599 | 376 | 1,014,978 | 63.15% |
| Western | 222 | 160 | 120,643 | 75.39% | 423 | 276 | 668,199 | 63.13% |
| Michigan | 3,143 | 2,445 | 1,182,347 | 77.30% | 7,634 | 5,471 | 7,606,591 | 69.66% |
| Region 1 | 111 | 88 | 34,285 | 76.64% | 249 | 180 | 252,982 | 70.66% |
| Region 2 | 111 | 73 | 51,706 | 63.99% | 271 | 192 | 402,996 | 70.60% |
| Region 3 | 445 | 353 | 157,899 | 78.53% | 1,007 | 748 | 928,432 | 73.01% |
| Region 4 | 284 | 231 | 101,098 | 82.97% | 762 | 576 | 642,567 | 74.55% |
| Region 5 | 527 | 433 | 209,324 | 82.09% | 1,361 | 1,052 | 1,283,845 | 76.42% |
| Region 6 | 248 | 199 | 101,086 | 80.54% | 555 | 409 | 618,067 | 71.34% |
| Region 7 | 529 | 393 | 211,045 | 73.66% | 1,257 | 861 | 1,327,476 | 65.00% |
| Region 8 | 404 | 310 | 138,708 | 76.92% | 941 | 614 | 956,248 | 65.55% |
| Region 9 | 255 | 186 | 93,386 | 72.49% | 726 | 467 | 658,476 | 60.20% |
| Region 10 | 229 | 179 | 83,809 | 76.22% | 505 | 372 | 535,501 | 70.44% |
| Minnesota | 1,264 | 982 | 635,000 | 77.54% | 2,985 | 2,142 | 4,147,990 | 71.84% |
| Regions 1 and 2 | 132 | 97 | 59,516 | 74.51% | 272 | 183 | 416,464 | 66.96% |
| Region 1 | 52 | 37 | 24,298 | 70.27% | 122 | 79 | 155,492 | 65.49% |
| Region 2 | 80 | 60 | 35,219 | 77.19% | 150 | 104 | 260,972 | 67.99% |
| Regions 3 and 4 | 250 | 196 | 111,319 | 76.67% | 528 | 380 | 703,972 | 74.20% |
| Region 3 | 67 | 50 | 36,440 | 73.07% | 103 | 73 | 248,519 | 73.82% |
| Region 4 | 183 | 146 | 74,878 | 77.82% | 425 | 307 | 455,453 | 74.31% |
| Regions 5 and 6 | 227 | 170 | 119,724 | 75.89% | 546 | 381 | 769,544 | 67.63% |
| Region 5 | 128 | 105 | 59,671 | 82.28% | 299 | 212 | 389,634 | 67.93% |
| Region 6 | 99 | 65 | 60,053 | 66.09% | 247 | 169 | 379,909 | 67.26% |
| Region 7 | 655 | 519 | 344,441 | 78.96% | 1,639 | 1,198 | 2,258,010 | 73.18% |
| Region 7A (Hennepin) | 290 | 220 | 131,150 | 76.10% | 703 | 518 | 935,344 | 75.17% |
| Region 7B (Ramsey) | 119 | 95 | 63,448 | 80.25% | 315 | 236 | 407,727 | 76.25% |
| Region 7C | 246 | 204 | 149,843 | 81.64% | 621 | 444 | 914,939 | 69.90% |
| Mississippi | 1,147 | 926 | 369,961 | 82.04% | 2,856 | 2,082 | 2,202,655 | 71.69% |
| Region 1 | 296 | 234 | 86,983 | 81.11% | 696 | 514 | 499,526 | 72.62% |
| Region 2 | 105 | 94 | 44,216 | 90.79% | 308 | 247 | 268,417 | 75.20% |
| Region 3 | 154 | 132 | 53,466 | 84.73% | 419 | 302 | 307,885 | 70.13% |
| Region 4 | 230 | 181 | 68,550 | 80.13% | 519 | 378 | 407,947 | 73.73% |
| Region 5 | 65 | 53 | 20,773 | 83.46% | 133 | 91 | 133,202 | 69.71% |
| Region 6 | 147 | 118 | 37,775 | 82.11% | 370 | 281 | 228,576 | 73.44% |
| Region 7 | 150 | 114 | 58,198 | 76.24% | 411 | 269 | 357,102 | 65.34% |
| Missouri | 1,206 | 949 | 706,985 | 79.07% | 3,008 | 2,159 | 4,583,870 | 69.77% |
| Central | 156 | 118 | 105,002 | 77.78% | 385 | 277 | 625,025 | 69.66% |
| Eastern | 415 | 333 | 235,338 | 80.33% | 1,069 | 762 | 1,593,064 | 69.81% |
| Eastern (St. Louis City and County) | 214 | 174 | 139,938 | 81.30% | 603 | 446 | 1,008,021 | 72.89% |
| Eastern (excluding St. Louis) | 201 | 159 | 95,400 | 79.37% | 466 | 316 | 585,043 | 66.22% |
| Northwest | 294 | 233 | 171,888 | 78.90% | 747 | 546 | 1,108,151 | 71.55% |
| Northwest (Jackson) | 155 | 130 | 74,259 | 82.30% | 398 | 296 | 507,830 | 72.12% |
| Northwest (excluding Jackson) | 139 | 103 | 97,629 | 74.93% | 349 | 250 | 600,321 | 70.95% |
| Southeast | 148 | 121 | 82,570 | 82.05% | 333 | 255 | 543,665 | 74.43% |
| Southwest | 193 | 144 | 112,186 | 75.72% | 474 | 319 | 713,965 | 64.43% |
| Montana | 1,266 | 971 | 114,610 | 76.56% | 3,132 | 2,262 | 792,939 | 70.36% |
| Region 1 | 104 | 79 | 9,166 | 72.98% | 184 | 143 | 62,168 | 77.60% |
| Region 2 | 189 | 144 | 17,179 | 75.18% | 479 | 354 | 111,316 | 69.95% |
| Region 3 | 270 | 189 | 23,676 | 71.17% | 694 | 502 | 163,281 | 71.79% |
| Region 4 | 324 | 248 | 30,322 | 77.24% | 851 | 593 | 212,218 | 68.83% |
| Region 5 | 379 | 311 | 34,268 | 81.35% | 924 | 670 | 243,955 | 69.61% |
| Nebraska | 1,251 | 969 | 230,669 | 77.60% | 3,025 | 2,144 | 1,395,872 | 70.44% |
| Regions 1 and 2 | 90 | 71 | 22,455 | 78.61% | 256 | 179 | 141,522 | 69.93% |
| Region 1 | 44 | 34 | 10,465 | 78.30% | 131 | 93 | 66,553 | 70.01% |
| Region 2 | 46 | 37 | 11,990 | 78.86% | 125 | 86 | 74,969 | 69.84% |
| Region 3 | 172 | 134 | 28,180 | 75.47% | 415 | 310 | 171,343 | 74.46% |
| Region 4 | 156 | 117 | 25,578 | 72.88% | 311 | 221 | 153,261 | 66.54% |
| Region 5 | 236 | 189 | 56,334 | 81.05% | 681 | 487 | 349,383 | 71.64% |
| Region 6 | 597 | 458 | 98,121 | 77.83% | 1,362 | 947 | 580,364 | 69.52% |
| Nevada | 1,202 | 994 | 331,099 | 82.74% | 2,979 | 2,180 | 2,182,228 | 70.50% |
| Clark – Region 1 | 894 | 745 | 240,327 | 83.08% | 2,137 | 1,570 | 1,572,346 | 70.44% |
| Region 3 | 108 | 81 | 39,221 | 75.70% | 307 | 210 | 267,727 | 65.92% |
| Capital District | 37 | 28 | 17,612 | 75.18% | 109 | 75 | 127,816 | 63.40% |
| Rural/Frontier | 71 | 53 | 21,609 | 76.00% | 198 | 135 | 139,910 | 67.87% |
| Washoe – Region 2 | 200 | 168 | 51,550 | 85.12% | 535 | 400 | 342,155 | 73.77% |
| New Hampshire | 1,312 | 983 | 154,875 | 76.07% | 3,097 | 2,131 | 1,053,471 | 67.37% |
| Central | 479 | 360 | 45,187 | 75.90% | 1,053 | 755 | 300,402 | 69.36% |
| Central 1 | 238 | 178 | 23,712 | 76.54% | 483 | 346 | 149,234 | 68.93% |
| Central 2 | 241 | 182 | 21,475 | 75.18% | 570 | 409 | 151,168 | 69.75% |
| Northern | 139 | 106 | 19,423 | 77.42% | 352 | 267 | 138,182 | 71.16% |
| Southern | 694 | 517 | 90,265 | 75.89% | 1,692 | 1,109 | 614,887 | 65.43% |
| Southern 1 (Rockingham) | 237 | 155 | 33,329 | 66.73% | 600 | 394 | 236,373 | 66.51% |
| Southern 2 | 457 | 362 | 56,936 | 80.47% | 1,092 | 715 | 378,514 | 64.84% |
| New Jersey | 2,114 | 1,579 | 1,033,555 | 74.26% | 5,036 | 3,339 | 6,845,720 | 65.22% |
| Central | 510 | 357 | 239,285 | 70.29% | 1,126 | 720 | 1,566,037 | 63.59% |
| Metropolitan | 449 | 326 | 260,263 | 72.39% | 1,183 | 777 | 1,649,807 | 64.05% |
| Northern | 693 | 543 | 318,919 | 78.24% | 1,754 | 1,169 | 2,209,141 | 63.93% |
| Southern | 462 | 353 | 215,089 | 75.08% | 973 | 673 | 1,420,735 | 70.81% |
| New Mexico | 1,157 | 976 | 246,704 | 85.82% | 2,769 | 2,155 | 1,555,252 | 76.92% |
| Region 1 | 245 | 210 | 54,806 | 86.60% | 547 | 436 | 320,110 | 77.30% |
| Region 2 | 124 | 116 | 30,307 | 94.85% | 310 | 250 | 227,155 | 78.76% |
| Region 3 (Bernalillo) | 370 | 302 | 76,454 | 82.33% | 991 | 755 | 508,712 | 76.71% |
| Region 4 | 158 | 133 | 34,203 | 85.42% | 348 | 266 | 191,461 | 72.94% |
| Region 5 | 260 | 215 | 50,933 | 86.65% | 573 | 448 | 307,815 | 78.10% |
| Region 5a | 120 | 102 | 21,447 | 89.08% | 286 | 225 | 147,310 | 77.09% |
| Region 5b (Dona Ana) | 140 | 113 | 29,486 | 84.43% | 287 | 223 | 160,505 | 79.43% |
| New York | 4,482 | 3,270 | 2,180,289 | 71.18% | 11,379 | 7,381 | 15,326,050 | 62.30% |
| Region 1: Long Island | 745 | 515 | 331,745 | 67.95% | 1,703 | 976 | 2,202,755 | 56.20% |
| Region 2: New York City | 1,659 | 1,146 | 864,081 | 67.16% | 4,880 | 2,938 | 6,646,216 | 57.38% |
| Region 2A: Bronx | 411 | 323 | 179,377 | 79.68% | 896 | 651 | 1,058,323 | 71.21% |
| Region 2B: Kings | 506 | 314 | 278,589 | 60.32% | 1,428 | 820 | 1,995,099 | 54.49% |
| Region 2C: New York | 237 | 176 | 126,561 | 73.45% | 1,016 | 630 | 1,393,420 | 60.76% |
| Region 2D: Queens | 394 | 251 | 226,790 | 61.40% | 1,252 | 665 | 1,833,734 | 50.74% |
| Region 2E: Richmond | 111 | 82 | 52,765 | 75.94% | 288 | 172 | 365,641 | 57.72% |
| Region 3: Mid-Hudson | 560 | 391 | 281,749 | 66.27% | 1,202 | 757 | 1,762,699 | 60.98% |
| Region 4: Capital Region | 215 | 163 | 107,427 | 74.94% | 476 | 350 | 744,482 | 74.10% |
| Region 5: Mohawk Valley | 44 | 28 | 30,563 | 63.22% | 123 | 98 | 203,261 | 80.09% |
| Region 6: North Country | 55 | 45 | 32,025 | 82.32% | 169 | 129 | 242,330 | 76.47% |
| Region 7: Tug Hill Seaway | 78 | 67 | 31,381 | 89.56% | 214 | 165 | 195,295 | 74.74% |
| Region 8: Central | 298 | 240 | 123,819 | 81.40% | 575 | 449 | 790,248 | 76.55% |
| Region 9: Southern Tier | 112 | 94 | 56,956 | 83.66% | 259 | 217 | 353,216 | 81.68% |
| Region 10: Finger Lakes | 290 | 232 | 148,955 | 78.62% | 738 | 539 | 989,065 | 70.99% |
| Region 11: Western | 426 | 349 | 171,589 | 82.92% | 1,040 | 763 | 1,196,482 | 70.17% |
| North Carolina | 1,941 | 1,547 | 1,150,506 | 79.80% | 4,707 | 3,449 | 7,538,179 | 71.86% |
| Alliance Behavioral Healthcare 1 | 219 | 179 | 95,410 | 80.43% | 497 | 367 | 594,097 | 72.12% |
| Alliance Behavioral Healthcare 2 | 172 | 149 | 121,754 | 88.51% | 411 | 296 | 734,002 | 71.64% |
| Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions 1 | 189 | 138 | 93,454 | 71.16% | 342 | 222 | 564,709 | 64.75% |
| Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions 2 | 104 | 83 | 79,917 | 79.74% | 296 | 220 | 517,054 | 73.01% |
| Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions 3 | 165 | 129 | 113,890 | 78.57% | 495 | 357 | 741,529 | 69.84% |
| CenterPoint Human Services | 113 | 90 | 63,494 | 80.97% | 286 | 219 | 416,164 | 75.84% |
| Eastpointe | 231 | 183 | 96,546 | 78.18% | 472 | 353 | 624,214 | 73.24% |
| Partners Behavioral Health Management | 170 | 144 | 104,359 | 84.68% | 341 | 250 | 695,496 | 70.35% |
| Sandhills Center 1 | 77 | 59 | 66,978 | 79.44% | 198 | 149 | 432,349 | 75.93% |
| Sandhills Center 2 | 104 | 90 | 62,072 | 87.17% | 269 | 187 | 392,881 | 69.96% |
| Smoky Mountain Center 1 | 112 | 79 | 58,490 | 70.06% | 294 | 220 | 424,488 | 72.24% |
| Smoky Mountain Center 2 | 80 | 60 | 53,046 | 76.30% | 258 | 190 | 421,844 | 72.96% |
| Trillium Health Resources 1 | 133 | 114 | 70,954 | 86.91% | 348 | 280 | 480,390 | 77.32% |
| Trillium Health Resources 2 | 72 | 50 | 70,141 | 68.26% | 200 | 139 | 498,965 | 68.46% |
| North Dakota | 1,344 | 1,051 | 94,691 | 78.86% | 2,966 | 2,181 | 565,225 | 72.57% |
| Badlands and West Central | 352 | 276 | 23,558 | 79.11% | 801 | 580 | 151,189 | 71.97% |
| Badlands | 55 | 43 | 5,065 | 75.70% | 135 | 97 | 34,418 | 73.39% |
| West Central | 297 | 233 | 18,493 | 79.77% | 666 | 483 | 116,771 | 71.68% |
| Lake Region | 84 | 64 | 5,869 | 77.71% | 155 | 122 | 30,711 | 78.69% |
| North Central | 153 | 118 | 13,207 | 77.47% | 328 | 244 | 79,334 | 72.92% |
| Northeast | 212 | 173 | 13,362 | 83.55% | 451 | 331 | 72,104 | 71.10% |
| Northwest | 51 | 37 | 4,745 | 75.13% | 128 | 81 | 30,311 | 60.12% |
| South Central | 71 | 50 | 6,614 | 64.63% | 182 | 131 | 44,857 | 75.51% |
| Southeast | 421 | 333 | 27,336 | 79.49% | 921 | 692 | 156,719 | 73.67% |
| Ohio | 3,154 | 2,386 | 1,376,806 | 74.84% | 7,820 | 5,442 | 8,812,617 | 67.93% |
| Boards 2, 46, 55, and 68 | 139 | 100 | 63,029 | 67.57% | 271 | 179 | 386,190 | 63.74% |
| Boards 3, 52, and 85 | 111 | 80 | 49,596 | 68.14% | 217 | 149 | 286,414 | 73.51% |
| Boards 4 and 78 | 82 | 63 | 33,999 | 78.08% | 232 | 176 | 237,864 | 75.99% |
| Boards 5 and 60 | 94 | 66 | 45,267 | 72.30% | 235 | 170 | 261,526 | 70.29% |
| Boards 7, 15, 41, 79, and 84 | 121 | 83 | 49,683 | 66.83% | 274 | 171 | 356,695 | 61.28% |
| Boards 8, 13, and 83 | 123 | 95 | 63,145 | 74.47% | 227 | 145 | 376,691 | 62.33% |
| Board 9 (Butler) | 117 | 79 | 49,736 | 67.19% | 265 | 167 | 279,429 | 61.40% |
| Board 12 | 116 | 83 | 43,151 | 66.46% | 231 | 159 | 266,843 | 68.83% |
| Boards 18 and 47 | 369 | 282 | 176,770 | 75.67% | 997 | 710 | 1,196,862 | 69.85% |
| Boards 20, 32, 54, and 69 | 138 | 112 | 41,741 | 82.42% | 321 | 228 | 257,077 | 70.95% |
| Boards 21, 39, 51, 70, and 80 | 165 | 124 | 68,761 | 75.29% | 292 | 212 | 419,629 | 70.63% |
| Boards 22, 74, and 87 | 140 | 113 | 47,843 | 79.51% | 307 | 226 | 298,088 | 70.55% |
| Boards 23 and 45 | 145 | 109 | 48,559 | 74.14% | 359 | 248 | 285,280 | 65.52% |
| Board 25 (Franklin) | 324 | 249 | 142,114 | 78.26% | 896 | 624 | 916,263 | 68.00% |
| Boards 27, 71, and 73 | 131 | 96 | 57,053 | 73.68% | 322 | 209 | 375,064 | 60.95% |
| Boards 28, 43, and 67 | 137 | 101 | 59,784 | 73.17% | 400 | 275 | 377,548 | 67.28% |
| Board 31 (Hamilton) | 212 | 158 | 91,803 | 73.95% | 562 | 384 | 603,424 | 66.29% |
| Board 48 (Lucas) | 97 | 80 | 52,258 | 80.49% | 272 | 192 | 329,959 | 64.89% |
| Boards 50 and 76 | 172 | 133 | 69,292 | 76.82% | 475 | 333 | 471,711 | 69.46% |
| Board 57 (Montgomery) | 107 | 94 | 61,962 | 89.26% | 320 | 236 | 416,147 | 72.97% |
| Board 77 (Summit) | 114 | 86 | 61,260 | 74.13% | 345 | 249 | 413,912 | 67.86% |
| Oklahoma | 1,247 | 944 | 461,843 | 75.12% | 3,062 | 2,151 | 2,866,854 | 67.42% |
| Central | 178 | 137 | 60,354 | 75.33% | 427 | 293 | 366,536 | 64.66% |
| East Central | 145 | 107 | 53,840 | 74.91% | 324 | 229 | 327,085 | 68.66% |
| Northeast | 147 | 109 | 59,763 | 72.74% | 388 | 270 | 365,000 | 67.90% |
| Northwest and Southwest | 193 | 156 | 66,323 | 78.70% | 396 | 294 | 407,463 | 69.88% |
| Oklahoma County | 186 | 148 | 87,083 | 76.73% | 546 | 381 | 555,362 | 66.37% |
| Southeast | 172 | 127 | 60,975 | 75.31% | 412 | 290 | 388,160 | 69.04% |
| Tulsa County | 226 | 160 | 73,505 | 72.22% | 569 | 394 | 457,247 | 66.42% |
| Oregon | 1,269 | 960 | 434,609 | 76.13% | 3,078 | 2,216 | 3,133,289 | 71.13% |
| Region 1 (Multnomah) | 235 | 171 | 73,920 | 71.04% | 673 | 462 | 627,664 | 69.18% |
| Region 2 | 398 | 308 | 108,537 | 78.51% | 773 | 568 | 734,104 | 72.48% |
| Region 3 | 340 | 253 | 145,315 | 75.21% | 901 | 662 | 973,074 | 72.34% |
| Region 4 | 171 | 132 | 55,877 | 77.84% | 420 | 313 | 445,555 | 70.76% |
| Region 5 (Central) | 49 | 38 | 22,308 | 75.35% | 116 | 70 | 162,608 | 69.35% |
| Region 6 (Eastern) | 76 | 58 | 28,651 | 79.99% | 195 | 141 | 190,283 | 69.13% |
| Pennsylvania | 3,120 | 2,444 | 1,449,943 | 78.45% | 7,432 | 5,326 | 9,908,218 | 70.32% |
| Region 1 (Allegheny) | 229 | 171 | 125,049 | 75.62% | 745 | 491 | 979,005 | 66.91% |
| Regions 3, 8, 9, and 51 | 215 | 172 | 78,431 | 80.39% | 487 | 355 | 549,973 | 71.48% |
| Regions 4, 11, 37, and 49 | 206 | 149 | 106,827 | 73.36% | 462 | 321 | 698,209 | 69.98% |
| Regions 5, 18, 23, 24, and 46 | 202 | 166 | 83,605 | 82.10% | 489 | 366 | 579,877 | 72.57% |
| Regions 6, 12, 16, 31, 35, 45, and 47 | 182 | 147 | 89,248 | 81.95% | 402 | 308 | 562,637 | 72.23% |
| Regions 7, 13, 20, and 33 | 616 | 482 | 291,035 | 78.26% | 1,434 | 982 | 1,917,341 | 67.39% |
| Regions 10, 15, 27, 32, 43, and 44 | 102 | 83 | 53,882 | 81.33% | 279 | 216 | 399,808 | 73.66% |
| Regions 17 and 21 | 88 | 63 | 44,957 | 71.72% | 216 | 162 | 283,787 | 74.58% |
| Regions 19, 26, 28, and 42 | 395 | 301 | 170,669 | 77.05% | 882 | 656 | 1,117,029 | 72.07% |
| Regions 22, 38, 40, 41, and 48 | 185 | 149 | 82,848 | 79.88% | 482 | 336 | 652,080 | 68.71% |
| Regions 29 and 34 | 169 | 129 | 78,899 | 76.50% | 329 | 213 | 507,199 | 64.86% |
| Regions 30 and 50 | 167 | 131 | 64,614 | 78.86% | 377 | 286 | 477,374 | 76.63% |
| Region 36 (Philadelphia) | 364 | 301 | 179,879 | 80.21% | 848 | 634 | 1,183,899 | 73.46% |
| Rhode Island | 1,211 | 947 | 120,526 | 78.46% | 3,138 | 2,190 | 829,196 | 68.92% |
| Region 1: Southern Providence County | 193 | 141 | 19,434 | 72.29% | 521 | 330 | 152,440 | 66.27% |
| Region 2: Northern Providence County/
Blackstone Valley |
297 | 236 | 22,858 | 80.06% | 782 | 559 | 165,039 | 68.55% |
| Region 3: Providence | 180 | 151 | 27,596 | 82.54% | 486 | 369 | 137,221 | 74.89% |
| Region 4: Kent County | 187 | 150 | 16,574 | 81.34% | 456 | 324 | 135,835 | 70.40% |
| Region 5: East Bay | 116 | 95 | 10,232 | 82.32% | 302 | 214 | 77,111 | 69.01% |
| Region 6: Newport County | 96 | 65 | 8,633 | 68.82% | 250 | 150 | 65,704 | 63.32% |
| Region 7: South County | 142 | 109 | 15,200 | 77.48% | 341 | 244 | 95,847 | 69.84% |
| South Carolina | 1,238 | 998 | 554,493 | 80.82% | 3,011 | 2,206 | 3,704,783 | 72.65% |
| Region 1 | 369 | 300 | 177,635 | 82.80% | 889 | 633 | 1,156,520 | 68.79% |
| Region 2 | 377 | 301 | 143,058 | 80.20% | 801 | 570 | 908,309 | 70.33% |
| Region 3 | 220 | 171 | 89,361 | 76.00% | 539 | 398 | 644,968 | 74.52% |
| Region 4 | 272 | 226 | 144,440 | 82.39% | 782 | 605 | 994,986 | 77.68% |
| South Dakota | 1,278 | 1,007 | 103,486 | 79.11% | 2,880 | 2,109 | 631,809 | 73.03% |
| Region 1 | 276 | 219 | 25,408 | 77.40% | 691 | 519 | 155,569 | 74.44% |
| Region 2 | 120 | 96 | 10,026 | 81.25% | 234 | 176 | 57,293 | 76.61% |
| Region 3 | 311 | 245 | 25,113 | 79.58% | 664 | 483 | 150,285 | 73.70% |
| Region 4 | 215 | 170 | 14,744 | 79.57% | 397 | 295 | 89,128 | 71.13% |
| Region 5 | 356 | 277 | 28,196 | 78.97% | 894 | 636 | 179,535 | 71.17% |
| Tennessee | 1,261 | 979 | 789,042 | 77.55% | 3,024 | 2,240 | 4,999,822 | 72.48% |
| Region 1 | 140 | 109 | 57,411 | 76.58% | 281 | 211 | 409,331 | 69.98% |
| Region 2 | 192 | 152 | 141,017 | 81.19% | 510 | 391 | 941,367 | 76.89% |
| Region 3 | 197 | 148 | 114,695 | 75.94% | 490 | 371 | 754,196 | 75.92% |
| Region 4 (Davidson) | 105 | 73 | 72,028 | 73.61% | 304 | 206 | 502,251 | 65.61% |
| Region 5 | 333 | 249 | 204,741 | 75.96% | 698 | 499 | 1,202,771 | 72.79% |
| Region 6 | 101 | 80 | 77,846 | 78.39% | 298 | 219 | 486,354 | 65.49% |
| Region 7 (Shelby) | 193 | 168 | 121,305 | 80.47% | 443 | 343 | 703,552 | 74.25% |
| Texas | 4,241 | 3,448 | 3,549,733 | 81.00% | 10,097 | 7,449 | 19,733,150 | 71.72% |
| Region 1 | 112 | 80 | 117,711 | 69.12% | 329 | 237 | 647,431 | 70.71% |
| Region 2 | 105 | 89 | 70,068 | 82.59% | 250 | 189 | 421,410 | 75.37% |
| Region 3 | 1,221 | 1,022 | 943,303 | 83.79% | 2,924 | 2,252 | 5,312,787 | 75.45% |
| Region 3a | 786 | 636 | 603,411 | 80.97% | 1,850 | 1,366 | 3,392,041 | 71.83% |
| Region 3bc | 435 | 386 | 339,892 | 89.11% | 1,074 | 886 | 1,920,746 | 81.79% |
| Region 4 | 167 | 143 | 138,151 | 85.27% | 458 | 379 | 867,534 | 81.06% |
| Region 5 | 100 | 85 | 95,784 | 85.98% | 256 | 207 | 599,333 | 78.71% |
| Region 6 | 987 | 769 | 851,043 | 77.39% | 2,324 | 1,540 | 4,783,998 | 63.33% |
| Region 6a | 876 | 683 | 765,152 | 77.61% | 2,100 | 1,387 | 4,280,533 | 63.28% |
| Region 6bc | 111 | 86 | 85,891 | 75.63% | 224 | 153 | 503,465 | 63.75% |
| Region 7 | 509 | 395 | 420,793 | 77.52% | 1,283 | 931 | 2,425,665 | 71.05% |
| Region 7a | 305 | 228 | 259,866 | 75.29% | 797 | 561 | 1,546,425 | 69.30% |
| Region 7bcd | 204 | 167 | 160,928 | 81.27% | 486 | 370 | 879,240 | 74.18% |
| Region 8 | 406 | 344 | 369,937 | 84.52% | 1,015 | 766 | 2,059,794 | 73.97% |
| Region 9 | 99 | 73 | 78,074 | 76.29% | 225 | 139 | 443,839 | 59.71% |
| Region 10 | 138 | 107 | 131,965 | 76.66% | 280 | 217 | 630,716 | 75.37% |
| Region 11 | 397 | 341 | 332,904 | 85.73% | 753 | 592 | 1,540,643 | 75.08% |
| Region 11abd | 256 | 213 | 201,000 | 82.11% | 490 | 375 | 977,902 | 72.96% |
| Region 11c (Hidalgo) | 141 | 128 | 131,904 | 92.37% | 263 | 217 | 562,741 | 78.52% |
| Utah | 1,139 | 977 | 426,435 | 85.30% | 2,740 | 2,132 | 2,066,736 | 76.48% |
| Bear River, Northeastern, Summit, Tooele, and Wasatch |
106 | 94 | 52,930 | 88.90% | 229 | 179 | 247,427 | 78.30% |
| Central, Four Corners, San Juan, and Southwest |
123 | 105 | 52,714 | 88.30% | 287 | 206 | 250,047 | 70.58% |
| Central, Four Corners, and San Juan | 49 | 38 | 20,887 | 83.59% | 121 | 88 | 95,230 | 72.79% |
| Southwest | 74 | 67 | 31,827 | 91.29% | 166 | 118 | 154,816 | 68.81% |
| Davis County | 116 | 93 | 47,892 | 77.18% | 234 | 179 | 220,512 | 75.44% |
| Salt Lake County | 476 | 413 | 147,675 | 85.78% | 1,211 | 958 | 792,739 | 78.05% |
| Utah County | 202 | 172 | 90,104 | 85.03% | 507 | 391 | 376,232 | 75.16% |
| Weber, Morgan | 116 | 100 | 35,120 | 85.29% | 272 | 219 | 179,780 | 77.71% |
| Vermont | 1,227 | 945 | 69,363 | 77.27% | 2,983 | 2,090 | 501,770 | 70.75% |
| Champlain Valley | 528 | 409 | 30,611 | 79.00% | 1,372 | 956 | 201,776 | 68.55% |
| Rural Northeast | 252 | 193 | 15,974 | 72.76% | 564 | 393 | 117,817 | 71.96% |
| Rural Southeast | 259 | 193 | 12,476 | 74.96% | 608 | 435 | 103,906 | 72.97% |
| Rural Southwest | 188 | 150 | 10,302 | 81.43% | 439 | 306 | 78,272 | 72.45% |
| Virginia | 1,960 | 1,559 | 925,947 | 79.75% | 4,752 | 3,384 | 6,294,357 | 69.53% |
| Region 1 | 256 | 215 | 154,624 | 82.89% | 676 | 510 | 975,404 | 73.10% |
| Region 2 | 558 | 428 | 252,543 | 78.09% | 1,423 | 944 | 1,778,797 | 64.18% |
| Region 3 | 305 | 238 | 149,400 | 76.85% | 815 | 618 | 1,066,498 | 73.86% |
| Region 4 | 338 | 273 | 159,366 | 81.77% | 803 | 569 | 1,072,836 | 70.29% |
| Region 5 | 503 | 405 | 210,015 | 80.42% | 1,035 | 743 | 1,400,823 | 70.13% |
| Washington | 1,221 | 957 | 827,195 | 78.09% | 3,028 | 2,119 | 5,452,060 | 69.24% |
| Region 1 | 317 | 259 | 206,611 | 81.16% | 656 | 451 | 1,170,456 | 69.23% |
| Greater Columbia and North Central | 224 | 183 | 131,248 | 81.85% | 424 | 288 | 692,588 | 67.50% |
| Spokane | 93 | 76 | 75,363 | 79.49% | 232 | 163 | 477,868 | 72.11% |
| Region 2 | 500 | 373 | 353,258 | 74.01% | 1,432 | 975 | 2,528,868 | 66.38% |
| King | 303 | 221 | 216,593 | 71.78% | 957 | 646 | 1,620,679 | 65.89% |
| North Sound | 197 | 152 | 136,664 | 77.35% | 475 | 329 | 908,189 | 67.38% |
| Region 3 | 404 | 325 | 267,326 | 81.03% | 940 | 693 | 1,752,736 | 73.78% |
| Pierce | 193 | 160 | 101,689 | 83.13% | 478 | 369 | 638,133 | 77.89% |
| Salish | 55 | 42 | 39,709 | 79.12% | 135 | 89 | 295,141 | 67.36% |
| SW WA and Great Rivers | 103 | 83 | 88,952 | 79.82% | 245 | 180 | 562,027 | 72.97% |
| Thurston-Mason | 53 | 40 | 36,976 | 78.18% | 82 | 55 | 257,435 | 65.55% |
| West Virginia | 1,338 | 983 | 204,404 | 74.37% | 3,143 | 2,120 | 1,443,317 | 65.29% |
| Region I | 86 | 59 | 15,563 | 68.08% | 221 | 145 | 114,550 | 62.16% |
| Region II | 195 | 155 | 32,297 | 80.41% | 422 | 301 | 202,685 | 72.05% |
| Region III | 121 | 82 | 18,102 | 65.29% | 287 | 199 | 132,177 | 64.59% |
| Region IV | 339 | 245 | 47,890 | 74.91% | 776 | 501 | 321,732 | 64.77% |
| Region V | 323 | 223 | 56,350 | 70.90% | 819 | 527 | 408,659 | 60.44% |
| Region VI | 274 | 219 | 34,201 | 79.23% | 618 | 447 | 263,514 | 69.25% |
| Wisconsin | 1,295 | 988 | 638,347 | 74.72% | 3,075 | 2,153 | 4,404,440 | 69.75% |
| Milwaukee | 199 | 155 | 112,040 | 78.31% | 567 | 381 | 705,880 | 66.81% |
| Northeastern | 233 | 168 | 133,164 | 68.08% | 593 | 433 | 957,254 | 74.63% |
| Northern | 113 | 94 | 50,016 | 83.67% | 241 | 186 | 382,235 | 78.18% |
| Southeastern | 337 | 238 | 134,304 | 69.59% | 646 | 427 | 888,924 | 66.21% |
| Southern | 268 | 216 | 120,564 | 77.59% | 677 | 480 | 866,220 | 67.55% |
| Western | 145 | 117 | 88,259 | 79.14% | 351 | 246 | 603,927 | 70.02% |
| Wyoming | 1,257 | 996 | 65,756 | 77.72% | 2,909 | 2,166 | 437,329 | 73.44% |
| Judicial District 1 (Laramie) | 184 | 135 | 10,616 | 73.10% | 489 | 356 | 71,842 | 69.66% |
| Judicial District 2 | 156 | 130 | 7,082 | 81.05% | 366 | 291 | 43,273 | 79.05% |
| Judicial District 3 | 188 | 150 | 10,180 | 77.41% | 378 | 291 | 60,068 | 77.37% |
| Judicial District 4 | 76 | 56 | 4,066 | 76.94% | 133 | 91 | 29,304 | 65.50% |
| Judicial District 5 | 104 | 82 | 6,142 | 81.64% | 242 | 190 | 41,797 | 80.55% |
| Judicial District 6 | 149 | 123 | 7,097 | 80.23% | 334 | 261 | 45,004 | 78.48% |
| Judicial District 7 (Natrona) | 179 | 154 | 8,682 | 85.01% | 406 | 314 | 59,360 | 77.94% |
| Judicial District 8 | 99 | 74 | 4,322 | 70.83% | 216 | 138 | 30,658 | 62.61% |
| Judicial District 9 | 122 | 92 | 7,570 | 69.60% | 345 | 234 | 56,024 | 66.53% |
| SPA = service planning area. NOTE: For substate region definitions, see the "2014-2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Substate Region Definitions" at https://www.samhsa.gov/data. NOTE: Computations in this table are based on a respondent's age at screening. Thus, the data in the Total Responded column(s) could differ from data in other NSDUH tables that use the respondent's age recorded during the interview. NOTE: To compute the pooled 2014-2016 weighted response rates, the three samples were combined, and the individual-year weights were used for the pooled sample. Thus, the response rates presented here are weighted across 3 years of data rather than being a simple average of the 2014, 2015, and 2016 individual response rates. NOTE: The total responded column represents the combined sample size from the 2014, 2015, and 2016 NSDUHs. NOTE: The population estimate is the simple average of the 2014, 2015, and 2016 population counts for individuals aged 12 to 20 and adults aged 18 or older. Because of rounding, the sum of the substate region population counts within a state may not exactly match the state population count listed in the table. Source: SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2014, 2015, and 2016. |
||||||||
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Box, G. E. P., & Tiao, G. C. (1992). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis (Wiley Classics Library). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2012). Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings (HHS Publication No. SMA 12-4713, NSDUH Series H-44). Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2013a). Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Mental health findings (HHS Publication No. SMA 13-4805, NSDUH Series H-47). Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2013b). Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings (HHS Publication No. SMA 13-4795, NSDUH Series H-46). Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2015a). 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Methodological resource book (Section 2, Sample design report). Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2015b, August). National Survey on Drug Use and Health: 2014 and 2015 redesign changes. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2016a). 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Methodological summary and definitions. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2016b). 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of the effects of the 2015 NSDUH questionnaire redesign: Implications for data users. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Folsom, R. E., Shah, B., & Vaish, A. (1999). Substance abuse in states: A methodological report on model based estimates from the 1994-1996 National Household Surveys on Drug Abuse. In Proceedings of the 1999 Joint Statistical Meetings, American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section, Baltimore, MD (pp. 371-375). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed., Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2016). Drinking levels defined. Retrieved from https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/moderate-binge-drinking
Office of Applied Studies. (2001). Development of computer-assisted interviewing procedures for the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (HHS Publication No. SMA 01-3514, Methodology Series M-3). Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Office of Applied Studies. (2005, September). Appendix C: Research on the impact of changes in NSDUH methods. In Results from the 2004 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings (HHS Publication No. SMA 05-4062, NSDUH Series H-28, pp. 145-154). Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Office of Applied Studies. (2008, June). Substate estimates from the 2004-2006 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Raftery, A. L., & Lewis, S. (1992). How many iterations in the Gibbs sampler? In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, & A. F. M. Smith (Eds.), Bayesian statistics 4 (pp. 763-774). London, England: Oxford University Press.
Rao, J. N. K. (2003). Small area estimation (Wiley Series in Survey Methodology). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Shah, B. V., Barnwell, B. G., Folsom, R., & Vaish, A. (2000). Design consistent small area estimates using Gibbs algorithm for logistic models. In Proceedings of the 2000 Joint Statistical Meetings, American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section, Indianapolis, IN (pp. 105-111). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
Wright, D. (2003, July). State estimates of substance use from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Volume II. Individual state tables and technical appendices (HHS Publication No. SMA 03-3826, NHSDA Series H-20). Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Wright, D., & Sathe, N. (2005, January). State estimates of substance use from the 2002-2003 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. SMA 05-3989, NSDUH Series H-26). Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/
This National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) document was prepared by the Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (CBHSQ), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and by RTI International (a registered trademark and a trade name of Research Triangle Institute), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Work by RTI was performed under Contract No. HHSS283201300001C.
At RTI, Neeraja S. Sathe and Kathryn Spagnola were responsible for the writing of the document, and Akhil K. Vaish was responsible for the overall methodology and estimation for the model-based Bayes estimates and confidence intervals. At SAMHSA, Matthew Williams reviewed the document and provided substantive revisions.
The following staff were responsible for generating the estimates: Akhil K. Vaish, Neeraja S. Sathe, and Kathryn Spagnola. The following staff provided other support: Brenda K. Porter and Ana Saravia. Ms. Spagnola also provided oversight for production of the document. Richard S. Straw edited it; Debbie F. Bond formatted its text and tables; and Teresa F. Bass, Kimberly Cone, Danny Occoquan, and Pamela Tuck prepared the web versions. Justine L. Allpress prepared the maps used in the associated files.
1 RTI International is a registered trademark and a trade name of Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
2 In 2002, the survey's name changed from the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA) to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH).
3 The Office of Applied Studies (OAS) is the former name of the Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (CBHSQ).
4 The target sample size per year in each of the small sample states is 960 completed interviews, with the exception of Hawaii where the target sample size is 967 completed interviews.
5 Prior to this effort, substate small area estimates using combined 1999-2001, 2002-2004, 2004-2006, 2006-2008, 2008-2010, 2010-2012, and 2012-2014 data have been produced by SAMHSA. These estimates can be found at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/. (For 2006-2008 and earlier estimates, see https://archive.samhsa.gov/data/.)
6 Files with a comma separated value (*.csv) extension are in plain text. They contain characters stored in a flat, nonproprietary format and can be opened by most computer programs. Computers with Microsoft Excel installed open *.csv files in Excel by default, with the fields automatically arranged appropriately in columns. Other database programs also open *.csv files with the fields appropriately arranged.
7 The exact changes are documented in the 2015 NSDUH's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) clearance package and in a summary report (CBHSQ, 2015b). The summary report and the 2015 NSDUH questionnaire are available on the SAMHSA website at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/.
8 The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA, 2016) defines binge drinking as a pattern of drinking that brings blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels to 0.08 grams per deciliter (g/dL). This typically occurs after four drinks for women and five drinks for men in about 2 hours.
9 Prior to 2015, NSDUH referred to "nonmedical" use of prescription drugs. See Section C of the 2015 NSDUH methodological summary and definitions report (CBHSQ, 2016a) for further discussion about the change in terminology from nonmedical use to misuse of prescription drugs in 2015. Specifically, the approach and definition for measuring the misuse of prescription drugs were revised to include questions about any use of prescription drugs in addition to questions about misuse (previously called "nonmedical use"). Also, the definition for misuse was revised to focus on specific behaviors that indicate misuse (i.e., use in any way a doctor did not direct respondents to use prescription drugs, including use without a prescription of one's own; use in greater amounts, more often, or longer than told to take a drug; and use in any other way not directed by a doctor). Moreover, questions pertaining to specific prescription drugs focused on the past 12 months instead of the lifetime period that was used in the 2014 and prior questionnaires.
10 The use of mixed models (fixed and random effects) allows additional error components (random effects) to be included. These account for differences between states and within-state variations that are not taken into account by the predictor variables (fixed effects) alone. It is also difficult (if not impossible) to produce valid mean squared errors (MSEs) for small area estimates based solely on a fixed-effect national regression model (i.e., synthetic estimation) (Rao, 2003, p. 52). The mixed models produce estimates that are approximately represented by a weighted combination of the direct estimate from the substate data and a regression estimate from the national model. The regression coefficients of the national model are estimated using data from all of the substate areas (i.e., borrowing strength), and the regression estimate for a particular substate area is obtained by applying the national model to the substate-specific predictor data. The regression estimate for the substate area is then combined with the direct estimate from the substate data in a weighted combination where the weights are obtained by minimizing the MSE (variance + squared bias) of the small area estimate.
11 Claritas is a market research firm headquartered in Ithaca, New York (see https://www.claritas.com/). When the Claritas data were obtained for the 2014-2016 NSDUHs, Claritas was affiliated with Nielsen Holdings, from which they became independent in January 2017.
12 Improper noninformative priors were used for the fixed regression coefficients. Because NSDUH's sample size is very large (approximately 200,000 observations across 3 years), it can be said with certainty that the posterior distribution for the fixed regression coefficients will be proper. For the W1 and W2 matrices, noninformative proper inverse Wishart prior distributions were used so that proper posterior distributions are guaranteed. Noninformative priors are used so that the data speak for themselves and inferences are unaffected by information external to the current data. For further information on Bayesian inference and analysis, see Box and Tiao (1992) and Gelman, Carlin, Stern, and Rubin (2003).
13 See Table 2 in the "2014-2016 NSDUH Substate Region Estimates: Excel Tables and CSV Files" at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/.
14 The RSE of an estimate is the posterior SE divided by the estimate itself. Note that the RSEs have been calculated based on the unbenchmarked small area estimates.
Long description, Equation 1: The model is given by the following equation: log of pi sub a, i, j, k divided by 1 minus pi sub a, i, j, k is equal to the sum of three terms. The first term is given by x transpose sub a, i, j, k times beta sub a. The second term is eta sub a, i. And the third term is nu sub a, i, j. Long description end. Return to Equation 1.